cclarry Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 5 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFigg Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 The truth will set you free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fleer Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 4 minutes ago, MrFigg said: The truth will set you free. Nah 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFigg Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 All babies look the same. Stop showing me pictures. 1 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoncaloL Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 (edited) Well ..its over now.. we can close this forum for good and go on with our lives Edited May 21 by GoncaloL 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoncaloL Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 (edited) I remember someone here stating that “All you need is Fabfilter plugins and you will never look back” let me tell you.. im coming after you! Edited May 21 by GoncaloL 2 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-53mph Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 So what is he selling? Right at the end........."buy my EQing course". But aren't all music production courses the same? 1 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott H Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 (edited) But, but, but, what about my prized UAD Pultec Passive EQ Collection? The interface looks super old school vintage! Surely this has the special analog mojo. I buy the vintage looking gear because I want to cosplay audio engineer. Someone needs to shut this guy up. He is spoiling all the fun! https://www.uaudio.com/uad-plugins/equalizers/pultec-passive-eq-collection.html Edited May 21 by Scott H 2 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bapu Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Uninstalled! 1 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bapu Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 @Fleer Do you suppose he'd say the same about reverbs? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-53mph Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 3 minutes ago, Bapu said: @Fleer Do you suppose he'd say the same about reverbs? I'd love to see his take on piano plugins.... 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fleer Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 21 minutes ago, Bapu said: @Fleer Do you suppose he'd say the same about reverbs? Banish the thought 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fleer Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 17 minutes ago, X-53mph said: I'd love to see his take on piano plugins.... Slowly but surely they draw their plans against us 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Rintoul Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 "About as useful as a chocolate teapot". I learned a new phrase today! Can't argue science...or can you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fleer Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 1 minute ago, Doug Rintoul said: Can't argue science...or can you? Hey, that’s my job. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFigg Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 23 minutes ago, Fleer said: Banish the thought All reverbs are the same. That’s why one should set a limit of anything over 100. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSistine Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 2 hours ago, MrFigg said: All babies look the same. Stop showing me pictures. As long as they're babies, but then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSistine Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 Seeing the Apple sign in his video all the time, I am not sure whether I should mistrust this guy! ? He has forgotten that the handling (UI) of the EQs is quite different and everyone has another taste! E.g. for me an EQ without direct number input is almost unusable or if the text is too small ... A user interface has to be comfortable for you as individual! He also forgets the limits of a plugin. Maybe the maximum freq is only 17000 Hz, or Q cannot go high enough ... (For example I was searching a long time to find a Gate/Expander with all the functionality required for a special task.) Other than that I believe that he is right! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumbquestions Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 From a sound design pov: what about the “analog” saturation produced by overdriving an emulated digital version of a real life EQ. Is that all the same too? Or is he just saying that boosts & cuts in db at any frequency point can be achieved through any eq plugin (which… that part is true). But what if I am level matching & using eq as more of a drive style effect? Idk if I can replicate driving neve circuitry with logic’s stock eq for example, but what do i know 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Walton Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 1 hour ago, dumbquestions said: From a sound design pov: what about the “analog” saturation produced by overdriving an emulated digital version of a real life EQ. Is that all the same too? Or is he just saying that boosts & cuts in db at any frequency point can be achieved through any eq plugin (which… that part is true). But what if I am level matching & using eq as more of a drive style effect? Idk if I can replicate driving neve circuitry with logic’s stock eq for example, but what do i know So of that gets chalked up to subtle differences. With a null test you won't hear a lot of differences as eq saturation usually is going to be very small in most plugins on a single track. Id agree that we don't need a large locker of digital EQs but even with the most feature rich eq on the market sometimes I want a different UI or limited options and has less to do with actual sound differences. That said, some EQs do sound different when you really push the settings. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now