-
Posts
248 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by norfolkmastering
-
Is There a Way to Run Multiple Instances of Cakewalk?
norfolkmastering replied to david40's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
Thanks for the explanation Mark, it's really useful to better understand this stuff. I don't want to have to use two hardware profiles but my larger hardware system (which I use when working in hybrid analogue/digital mode) uses six MOTU ultralites plus two hardware controllers, which is pretty well on the edge of what Windows/Firewire/Sonar copes with. It's a bit clunky! So for composing I use a single MOTU unit which is not practical to power at the same time as the full set up (I tried, but seven Firewire connected devices was too much for Windows to cope with). So I connect the single MOTU by USB and then only power up the MOTU units I am going to use. The work-a-round, once the desired hardware set up is powered up, is to reboot Windows before firing up Sonar. This seems to bring the Sonar boot-up time back down to normal (using the appropriate custom hardware profile). This ties in with your comments about Windows remembering the previous set up. My intention is to move to three MOTU 16As but I can't find a MIDI router to replace the MIDI ports I currently get from the ultralites. I've tried two MIDI routers but they all seem to struggle to work in multi-client mode (which I need). The ultralites do work okay in MIDI multi-client mode due to the Firewire interface. Once the new Windows 11 MIDI Services release is made public (sometime in 2025) I should have a way forward with the MIDI router issue. It promises (fingers crossed!) to offer multi-client support for any current MIDI router with Windows Class Compliant drivers. It is also going to offer what I currently have to use MIDI-OX and loopMIDI for (MIDI routing and virtual MIDI ports). I'm going to test all of that as soon as the public release is available. -
Thanks for the suggestion. I've had a go at creating two hardware profiles. See I have taken your suggestion a stage further: With hardware set 1 powered up, I deleted both aud.ini and ttsseq.ini Then I started Sonar. Checked I was happy with settings (e.g. pan law) then saved as a custom hardware config which can be loaded as part of a customised Sonar shortcut. Next I powered down and then power up with hardware set 2. Again I deleted aud.ini and ttsseq.ini and loaded Then I started Sonar (from the standard shortcut). Again checked I was happy with the settings and saved as a second custom hardware config with its own customised Sonar shortcut. This means that the aud.ini and ttsseq.ini files only contain the audio and midi listings of the hardware for their related hardware. I'm still experimenting so I'll let you now if that solves my slow Sonar loading issue.
-
Is There a Way to Run Multiple Instances of Cakewalk?
norfolkmastering replied to david40's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
I created two hardware profiles today and I am getting messages that they are being successfully applied. Due to MOTU driver limitations, I only power up the audio/MIDI interfaces for the profile I want to load. When switching between hardware profiles (which in my case means after powering down the PC and interfaces) the first loading of Sonar is extremely slow (at least 50 seconds after the SONAR splash screen appears). After that the loading time is much faster for the same profile. I have a couple of questions: 1. When you save a new hardware profile does it simply make a copy the AUD.INI file which was used when loading Sonar with the default profile? 2. Should I have deleted the default AUD.INI file before loading Sonar with the default profile BEFORE creating the custom profiles? I am trying to understand why Sonar is struggling to load when changing profiles? -
Is There a Way to Run Multiple Instances of Cakewalk?
norfolkmastering replied to david40's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
Do you mean the ‘new’ Sonar? The link seems to be from the legacy documentation? Is there any up to date documentation on how to use hardware profiles? -
Is There a Way to Run Multiple Instances of Cakewalk?
norfolkmastering replied to david40's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
It would be great if the Sonar dev team could confirm what’s possible with the current release. I’ve found a few other posts of folks with similar issues when changing hardware configurations. -
Is There a Way to Run Multiple Instances of Cakewalk?
norfolkmastering replied to david40's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
I've had a look through the Preferences menu but the only 'Advanced' item I can find is File\Advanced. I can't see anything to do with profiles there. There are some options under Customization\Backup/Restore Settings which might be what you are referring to? It doesn't seem to include a means to set the command line switch but that may be my lack of understanding! If you get a chance to check and give me a few tips on how to set this up, that would be great. -
Is There a Way to Run Multiple Instances of Cakewalk?
norfolkmastering replied to david40's topic in Cakewalk by BandLab
I just raised a new post about this topic here Was the easier way to switch between hardware profiles every implemented? -
This morning I powered up and loaded my main set up (after having powered down yesterday after a session with my composing set up (see above). The six MOTU audio interfaces were recognised fine by the MOTU app but Sonar struggled to get past the first SONAR screen. Previously it has taken up to a minute to get past this initial screen but today it won't at all. Did a PC reboot and Sonar started after about 45 secs. Sonar seems to struggle with changed audio interface hardware so your thoughts on this and my previous post would be welcome.
-
Thanks for the info, really useful. I've been reading up on the new Windows 11 support for MIDI, so it looks like a solution for me when the public release happens later this year. It looks like it provides: - multi-client support - MIDI routing (like you can do using MIDI-OX) - Virtual MIDI ports (similar to loopMIDI) They claim it will work with any existing MIDI router which is Windows class compliant. So that means that a MIDI router like the miditech MIDIFAC 8x8 should work with Sonar and my external hardware controllers. We shall see!
-
I got the software for my custom hardware controllers updated. It works but the MOTU micro light MIDI router is not very reliable when used multi client (Sonar and MIDI-OX). So I’m back on the lookout for a true multi client MIDI router. Has anyone had experience of the new Window 11 multi client drivers? I think they support MIDI as well so that may be the way to solve my issue.
-
I have two setups when using Sonar. My composing set up has a single MOTU 828mk3 Hybrid USB audio interface and no external hardware controllers. Recording is all digital. My main recording and mixdown set up has six MOTU ultralite mk3 Firewire audio interfaces and two external hardware controllers with a complex MIDI routing arrangement via MIDI-OX. This is used with a lot of audio I/O in a hybrid digital/analogue set up with tape machines. Recording is digital, analogue or both. Both run from the same PC. I only power up the hardware I am going to use for a session. If I power everything up, then the total loading of seven MOTU units and the controllers and the MIDI stuff begins to cause the whole system to struggle. If I've been using the main set up and then next day power up the composing set up, Sonar is quite slow to load and of course I get the warning that two controllers could not be connected to. Occasionally I get problems with random changing of audio sampling rate and have to power down and back up again to get it all sorted. Is there any way to store two set ups in Sonar so that switching between my composing and main recording set ups could be easier, load faster and be less prone to hiccups? I know that the Cakewalk stores some information about the audio interfaces in AUD.INI so I was wondering if I could have two versions of that, one for each set up? Or is there another way?
-
I think I got to the bottom of the problems I had with the micro lite. It doesn't like another MOTU USB MIDI driver being loaded as well as its own (I had the ultralite USB drivers loaded) That got it up and running reliably. The next issue was that the MOTU micro lite appears to be outputting all normal MIDI messages (including CCs) in MIDI Running Status mode. This means that the Status Byte is only transmitted once until there is a change of Status Byte value. I was amazed to find this on a USB MIDI interface. So my custom external controllers were not programmed to deal with this and were getting well and truly confused! I have worked out how to change the controller software to deal with MIDI running status so I guess I will do the work as I like the micro lite and it does work with both Sonar and MIDI-OX simultaneously.
-
I just spent some hours testing the MOTU micro lite 5x5 MIDI interface. Although I was able to select ports simultaneously on Sonar and MIDI-OX, operation during dual-client use was not reliable. Sometime it failed to pass SysEx, sometime it scrambled CCs, just not right. So I have reverted back to the MIDIs on my multiple MOTU ultralites. These work reliably under dual-client use. My search for a 5x5 (or bigger) MIDI interface with true multi-client operation under Windows continues ... Suggestions welcome!
-
That's great news Mark, thanks. I will do some testing of my own but it's really helpful to know that PDC is taken account of in the MTC generation. I want to use FX on the 'in the box' mix as it's much easier to build the song's sound palette in Sonar before I do much work on the analogue mix. If Sonar (with FX) didn't stay in sync with the tape machines then I would have to bypass the Sonar FX when adding additional tracks or doing overdubs (which I do in both Sonar and in analogue to the machines at the same time). Thanks again.
-
In my hybrid studio set up I slave locked three tape machines using LTC audio timecode, which is derived from the MTC available from Sonar. This is working well and the lockup is tight and reliable. The LTC is recorded on to one track of each machine from the MTC output when Sonar is playing. When I start adding VST effects to my 'in the box' mix, I guess each Sonar track may have a different amount of PDC applied so that all Sonar track audios stay in time sync. My question is whether PDC impacts on the MTC output? So let's assume I had recorded LTC audio timecode on to the three tape machines from Sonar MTC and at that time I had no PDC applied in Sonar. Now I start to mix in the box and as I add VST effects, then PDC is applied on some Sonar tracks to keep all Sonar tracks in sync. Does the MTC output from Sonar (to which my tape machines are slave locking) still have the same time relationship to Sonar tracks as it did before PDC was applied? If yes, is there a solution to bring the tape machines back into sync?
-
Thomann have agreed to take the MIDIface back so that's a relief. I've just ordered a MOTU Micro Lite USB (from Reverb) which seems to use the same MIDI drivers as the ultralite mk3. I wanted something compact as I'm tight for space. It is 5x5 which is enough for my needs. I'll let you know how that goes.
-
I tried changing Sonar to UWP. The MIDIface ports are not all recognised and have different names. I tried to enable a couple of them but I get the error message, 'The device handle is invalid'. So I switched back to MME I also noted that with MID-OX open and MIDIface ports selected in MIDI-OX, Sonar takes a very long time (about 1minute) to boot up (that's of course with no MIDIface ports selected in Sonar). So I think I need to send the MIDIface back and look for something with non-generic drivers. The MIDI ports in my Ultralite mk3s don't suffer from any of these issues. As I said before, I wanted to find another multiport MIDI interface solution before changing over to the MOTU 16As for my audio interfaces (16As sadly have no MIDI ports).
-
Yes I’m using a USB3 port. What brought this drama on is that I’m in the throes of replacing six MOTU ultralites with three MOTU 16As which don’t have MIDI interfaces. The ultralite MIDIs work just fine but in the move to the 16As I need to find a MIDI interface with at least 5 inputs and 4 outputs which allows both Sonar and MIDI-OX to access the same MIDI input ports.
-
I have further more serious problems with the MIDIface 8x8 It uses generic Windows drivers and it will not allow me to access its MIDI input ports from both Sonar and MIDI-OX at the same time. I tried using loopMIDI ports to get around the problem. So I route the the MIDIface input to a virtual loopMIDI port and then access that port in Sonar. It works but the MIDIface unit is struggling to pass MTC and is causing all sorts of response problems between Sonar and my two external controllers. My best guess is that the generic Windows drivers are not great and I may need to return the unit and find one that uses custom drivers. Thoughts on this whole issue would be welcomed.
-
I've just bought a MIDIface 8x8 and to test it I cabled each input to its corresponding output. Then I used MIDI-OX to send CC messages (from a fader) to all eight outputs, then monitored the inputs in MIDI-OX. I seem to be getting the CC messages okay in all inputs but I'm also getting random other messages which don't have a MIDI channel. They come up in yellow in the MIDI-OX input monitoring screen. Are these expected?
-
Best way to connect Sonar MTC to MOTU MIDI Express XT
norfolkmastering replied to norfolkmastering's topic in Cakewalk Sonar
I'm using Sonar to generate timecode to a MIDI output port. At the moment that's to a loopMIDI virtual port. I use that as the source for an MTC to LTC convertor which is a utility available in the ShowCockpit app. It comes out of my PC soundcard! The LTC is fed to all three of my machines, two Tascam 238S 8-tracks and one Fostex R8 8-track. All three machines use track 8 for recorded LTC timecode. The R8 uses a Fostex 4030 sync unit to do the actual slave synchronisation, but it also has a very comprehensive MIDI based remote control suite which includes the ability to locate to a specific full timecode (via SysEx). This MIDI control suite is incredible so I can use Sonar to set and unset the REC ARMs and a whole other bunch of stuff on the R8. The two 238Ss each have a Tascam ATS-500 sync unit. Again this these take care of slaving the 238Ss to Sonar. However the 238S remote control system is much more limited and based on RS232. So I have to use a PIC to translate MIDI remote control commands from Sonar (via AZ Controller) into the appropriate RS232 'text' character commands. These do include REC ARMs which is great. The ATS-500s have only CHASE mode (so it chases quarter frame timecode) and no facility to locate to a specific full timecode position. So instead, I send the Sonar song position timecode (again via AZ controller) to the PIC and then the PIC generates quarter frame timecode messages for enough time (about 2secs) towards that target song position. A couple of seconds is enough to get the ATS-500s to start chasing and it stops the machine when it gets to the target timecode. There should be an article coming out in the next RTM (Recording The Masters) newsletter which gives an overview of how this all hangs together, plus how I use Sonar to control my analogue mixer. All good fun! -
Best way to connect Sonar MTC to MOTU MIDI Express XT
norfolkmastering replied to norfolkmastering's topic in Cakewalk Sonar
I’m going to go with Sonar being the master for now. The MOTU should be able to slave to the Sonar MTC via the USB connection pretty well and then the MOTU will provide LTC to the three tape machines. We’ll see how that goes.