mettelus

+1, so many concerts are based more on visual, so if there is much exertion involved at all (especially with vocals), it will affect performance. Go jog a mile and sing a song while doing so... see how long the performance sounds good. Examples of this abound. The funniest one I ever saw was Justin Bieber yacking his guts out on the stage while the song kept going with his voice in tact. It only seems to get attention when someone makes an issue or a technical glitch happens (the technical glitches make them obvious), but many don't seem to care.

Welcome to the forum. The most obvious question is the track you are trying to record armed? When you hit "Record" in the transport, only tracks that are armed (the record button on the track) will actually record; the rest simply play.

Google 3D spectrogram. iZotope's Insight (included with Ozone bundles) is the one I use, and I also believe T-Racks has a 3D spectrogram as well, but not sure. There are also probably others. Although 3D can look cool, precision editing is better achieved in the 2D format (intensity = vertical height), with the utmost importance on the resolution of the spectrogram... as long as the resolution is high enough, harmonics stand out readily in 2D format and are easy to select/edit. The other advantage to SpectraLayers and Ozone is that you can separate stems first (not perfect, but workable), which allows you to isolate harmonics to the instrument you want to focus on (if the wave file is already mixed). You can also do such in a two-step process (there are free stem separators out there)... separate stems, edit via spectrogram in a DAW, then re-assemble in the DAW. A caution with stem separation though, they often leave residual frequencies in one stem belonging to another, so isolating a stem to be "pristine" may require a lot more effort than you bargained for.

+1 to the above, we definitely need more background to understand this better. Also, are you referring to the bass track when soloed or when mixing? An audio snippet of whichever case would help even more than trying to describe in text.

Roger that. The term for that one is "spectrogram" which gives a visual representation of frequency intensity and creates a "track view." Spectrum Analyzers (like SPAN) are basically if you turn the "now time" into a knife and are viewing the spectrogram's cross section as the play head moves (just the now time location is displayed). They each have their purpose in one's tool kit. Regarding spectrograms in particular, they are often used in post-production for things like noise removal, surgical tweaks, and other editing tasks. What differentiates them are the tools included, but most have selection tools that literally work with the spectrogram as if it were a picture (lasso/selection, erasers, "heal" tools to meld content uniformly (essentially a "blur" brush in a picture app)). Depending on what you want to do with a spectrogram app, you may need to get a higher (i.e., not free) version, with Steinberg's SpectraLayers and iZotope's RX being the most comprehensive IMO. For noise removal in particular, apps that can capture a "noise print" from an area that is supposed to be silent (often the lead in/fade out portion of an audio track) and then remove that noise print from the rest of the track are the most effective.

The unwound strings in particular (the ones you say are de-tuning) have less friction to each other on the post wraps, so I have always wrapped at least 4 turns on those strings. The purpose of the kink in the "luthier's knot" is to provide additional friction against the string being unwound (from slippage) on the post. Even when changing strings I loosen them just enough so I can "unwrap" them fully by pulling vertically at the post, then a slight tug will unbend that kink and pull it out with ease. The more wraps, the more friction... BB King was notorious for wrapping the entire string on posts. It is the same principle with ropes, especially things like rappelling... without a wrap of rope behind you to add friction, there is no way on earth you can control your body weight with one hand for five minutes with any degree of control. Even ascending ropes, a wrap is commonly used on one leg so you can pinch the rope on top of that foot with the free foot with very little force to rest your arms (even people with little upper body strength can do this method). People zooming up a rope with just upper body strength like the Man in Black at the Cliffs of Insanity is not common at all, but no one messes with the Man in Black (it's inconceivable)!!! Then again (back to the OP), locking tuners are a means to keep the string from slipping on the post... the "King Kong" version of the "luthier's knot" kink, so fewer wraps are needed and string changes are quicker. If you change strings often and don't have a string winder, locking tuners will certainly pay for themselves with the timed saved.

Yeah, if you have a hotmail account (free or not), you have OneDrive... due to the timing of this, a pop-up just sprung up automatically last week asking me if I wanted to sign up to ESU for free. Simple things like using Bing as your default search engine will rack up reward points (the other free method)... having your MS account linked to your computer will make any Bing searches rack up points automatically just by being logged into Windows.

Shame on you! In all seriousness, there are a lot of "hidden" features built into the free SPAN that not many use or even know about. I cheat even more to an extent by Googling "Can [this app] to [this detailed task]" quite often. Even simple things like overlapping tracks to visually see frequency collisions the free version can do just fine. I posted a gif analyzing a phase switch I installed in my guitar on the the old forums here (hard to believe that was over 10 years ago already). I inserted the SPAN gif from that post below.

Remember when Roland use to do their 2-hour interactive webinars? I actually just tried Googling to see if they are still alive, but cannot find any. I forget now if they were ever posted to YT or stayed resident on Roland's site.

The first grab in your video worked as expected (unfortunately waveforms don't redraw till you release), but the second (adding another clip does not). I actually captured similar in a video doing the same with track heights and said, "ooh, I found a bug... this should be working." What I found in that instance was that adding another element after processing the drag fails... the only way for it to function properly was to reset the selection and select them all from scratch again. Try deselecting and then re-selecting them all (+1) and see if that works as expected. IMO that is a bug, but would come down to what the bakers intend for usage.

Melda's MOscilloscope is part of their Free FX Bundle and one of the better ones out there. One of the best free spectrum analyzer's out there is Voxengo's SPAN. Both are free and have been around for years; and being 3rd party, they are not bound to any DAW or video editor so can be freely used in anything that can host VSTs.

Be sure to create an image or backup (image is preferred) before tackling things of this scope. For most installations, the last installation dominates, so if you install an older version with an earlier set of shared components, you will need to re-install the latest version over top of that (even if already installed) to bring them back to the current version.

This is where you should have stopped; your needs were met. Unfortunately, it is fairly commonplace for folks to rabbit-hole others with "my way is superior" rather than reading the OP and answering the question/intent of the OP. Suggestions are perfectly fine and more than welcome, but invalidating another's efforts and destroying their work is WAY over the top for me. Very rarely is there only one way to do something, so how others do something is totally irrelevant if your method works for you. I am sorry you went through this, especially since you were struggling and found a solution. If you want to take on suggestions for other methods when you have free time, that is a perfect way to learn and expand your toolbox, but be very wary about undoing a method you know works already.

When doing complex routings, it is better to sketch our your specific needs so 1) you can visually see the setup and 2) track connections (ins and outs) since each one is "consumed" as you use them. Work backwards on that sketch... from the OP it seems your recording to Filmora, so your video (screen capture) and audio mix needs to be seen there. Most video software has a "split audio/video" option, so I would leave anything "post-production" for that. Just do any ripple editing in the video software with the audio/video locked to each other so you don't slip them apart. You said you had VoiceMeeter working(?), and that exposes more outputs for you to use, so not sure why you deleted it. For audio routing, you want the output of the video editor for one you are editing (1), your microphone (2), and any extraneous audio (3) to output so Filmora (or your screen capture software) can see it as an input. The virtual mixer in VoiceMeeter allows you to combine all of those and adjust levels to give the final input to Filmora for a screen capture. Keep things as simple as possible, a DAW is not needed to capture the mic (Filmora will do that directly), and you can ripple edit and split audio/video post-production, so no need to have the computer do the same work twice. Only use connections that you need... audio from work you are editing and microphone seem to be about it from the OP. If using a loopback from an audio interface, you can just combine them there, but also realize that is "consumed" as well... if you loopback those to Filmora for a screen capture, you cannot also monitor what Filmora is recording with it since it will create a feedback loop (you would need to monitor via headphones on the audio interface to hear what Filmora is seeing during the capture). Bottom line is to check all routings... what do you need to hear/monitor, and what does your tutorial need to hear/record? When reading what you are trying to do, it seems that a DAW is superfluous to me... what is the "need" for a DAW in what you are doing? A video tutorial is your end goal, correct?

+1, even the tuners on my dad's old 1942 Harmony Nobility (fixed bridge) don't unwind. The friction on those is adjusted with the flat head screw on the back of the post. That tuner style is as basic as they come. Again, if a tuner is unwinding the peg has to move. Another idea that came to mind is if that guitar does have a tremolo, most (all??) tremolos move all strings by the same amount, so if the string tension is not balanced, the higher tension strings will be more likely to bind on the nut. I have used D'Addario Balanced Tension strings for years without issues, and have a floating Kahler tremolo on my main (I almost never use, but I did axle grease the internal hinge pin when I tore it apart 30 years ago). Even with all of the bending I do that doesn't de-tune (the neck is so narrow a full bend puts tension on 4 strings, a standard width neck puts tension on 3); the tremolo just rolls on that hinge pin without issue. Are the strings that de-tune always the same string(s)?