Jump to content

PhonoBrainer

Members
  • Posts

    2,629
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by PhonoBrainer

  1. I didn't think there was a ghost of a chance, but Beyonce took him back.
  2. Thanks so much for the feedback! @SPAK- thanks for the "making socks" idea, I'll poke around. Appreciate the comments! @kakku and @Grem - thanks, and I seem to get a Zappa reference occassionally. I have yet to hear anything by him all the way through, he was never on my radar at all. Maybe I should check it out! I did respect his appearance before Congress battling the Tipper Gore initiative - which was exactly 1 million light years ago. @freddy j - thanks! I like writing about mundane things and re-scaling them to be much more than they are. So glad you liked the song, thank you very much for the very kind words! @Andrew Ball - super kind of you, mate! You appear to be a long-suffering listener!!! I dig your stuff as well, and I would encourage you to post your tunes more often. Thanks for the lift! You have a double threat of guitar and keys, and a good voice as well. I think more people should check out your stuff. @Jesse Screed - good think I didn't post the 17 minute version then!!! Thanks for the idearrr and yes I could see a "radio" version. Should the need arise! And yes, always better. thanks again for the feedbacks.
  3. PhonoBrainer

    C'mon C'mon

    I dig Kloon's stuff. The groove is like an ecosystem. Lots of interdependent elements that are all mixed extremely well. Sounds like a clean, pro mix. Nice! Vocals hold it all together just great. I will diverge a little on the lyrics / meaning. From my perspective, kind of an older dude who's seen a few things, I found the theme and lyrics kind of preachy!!! But guess what - you are not writing this for me . . . Perhaps for a certain kind of person, this could be an anthem. For someone needing a guiding light, or something. This might be their song. Digression over. Nice tune, as usual. I haven't heard a clunker out of you yet. cheers, -Tom
  4. I like the beat, her voice, your pleasant if slightly dated video, which actually fits a kind of 80's groove. I didn't care for those auto-tune moments but please don't judge by my tastes, which are prehistoric. Mix wise, a little more bass wouldn't be out of place. cheers, -Tom
  5. Ah! These drums fit quite nicely. Nice tune. I liked how you strip the arrangement down in the middle, and modulate everything back in. Nice choice. For me the reverb choice (maybe it's chorus, too) on the synths, the arpeggiated stuff, the snare, the sax . . . very nice! But the occassional cymbal crash sounds drier. Maybe a little more rvb on that cymbal? And perhaps lower the cymbal just a bit in volume? I dunno, just a niggle really. Nothing wrong as is. cheers, -Tom
  6. Like Rush only with a better singer. And I LOVE Rush. How did you get that lead vocal so clear? Is it doubled? I know you have a lot of bgv's for spice, but occasionally when the lead vocal is exposed? it just comes across the guitars and such with such clarity. Very very nice. cheers, -Tom
  7. @Lynn - thanks hombre! quirky is where the fun is! Thanks for the compliments. I've never heard of Bombas. What have I been missing? @garybrun - wow I wish I could hear it on your Focals. What's the shipping from Norway? I have some Neumans but I usually do a headphone check as my most trusted source. I realize that makes no sense. Thanks, glad you liked the mix! @daryl1968 - thanks! The sax was tough to mix, I have little experience with live horns. Thanks for the heads up! Occasionally I have a soft sax line undercutting some vocals, I'm not sure about that choice. @thegaltieribrothers - thanks man! and yes, the video has begun its journey! much obliged for the listen. @Wookiee - thanks for relating. I'm just glad the lyrics are getting heard, I was worried they were a bit slurry in spots. Glad you dug the groove! @Grem - your comments will be passed along to the marketing department. Perhaps "socks" are too mundane a thing to sing about? I'm so glad you found it worth the time - I also sometimes balk at the longer ones - so glad you dug it and "comical but deep" was what I was aiming for. Gracias amigo.
  8. I do like it! Cool touches throughout. I like the delay on the guitar solo. I listened on headphones, mix was nice and clear, and well panned. cheers, -Tom
  9. All good until a bike messenger whacks her right off that cable car.
  10. I agree, nice perky vibe. I'm agreeing also with the drum comments above. It might be just the snare with a ton of roomy reverb. Do you ever think about more electronic / house type of drums? Might be interesting, personal taste of course. Cool work, Kakku. Your songs are breezy and make me want to visit Scandinavia. Is that where u are based? Cheers, -Tom
  11. Half a day? Damn. Were you on Mercury? This would have taken me a year. Loved your tune, the mix, and the awesome guitar tones. Great vocals too!
  12. Hey catchy little number you have hear. The 19 yr old mind was certainly a good story songteller. I was going to point out the compressed on the vocals but you got there first. Dunno if you are up for arrangement ideas, but it might be cool for the first four bars of the intro, just a capella vocals. Then the instrumentation sparse, then the drums as you have them. The vocals are nice and hooky. It has a 60s feel, which, doing the math, makes perfect sense ?
  13. Started this one two years ago? Rather deep in the weeds at present. Please hear and brutally critique what I long ago became oblivious to. Many thanks!
  14. Real purdy. I like how music of Ireland and Scotland can also sound kind of cowboy . . . git along Afton you little dogie. Cheers, Tom
  15. Nice job Tim. Time to party like it's 1729. It's a great original piece that JS would dig. Straight Outta Brandenburg. ? cheers, -Tom
  16. From a headphone listen, I'd say the bass is fine. Punchy. Maybe I heard it after you boosted things? Maybe also on monitors it becomes lightweight. I totally doubt it. ymmv. Nice mixing ear candy, very well done! -Tom
  17. I listened on headphones. I liked it inside of the first second turned it on. Cool groove, cool progression, cool as hell! So I imagine you are still playing with eq and such? What's great about this groove is also what could be trouble - it's pretty dense with all the parts. As I listen to the bass guitar, I get (again, on headphones, HD380 pro, they have decent bass response) I'm hearing the wonderful "plucky" bass highs. But also, some really deep and kind of gushy sub-bass. I think you also have some kind of boomwhacker in there? I'd maybe tame that sub-bass region just a bit, it fills and fills the basement. Might be worth moving that hpf up just a tad? It's most noticeable around 1:30, whatever chorus or section you have there. Maybe a bit more variation in the drum fills? OK, again, great song, vocals totally work a treat, I could hear plenty of the lyrics. Wouldn't this be fun to play live? The room would go crazy. cheers, -Tom
  18. Nice one. Welcome to the forum! Very tasteful all the way through. Mix-wise, maybe bass up a tad. I listened on headphones but could still have used more root. Your tune has a cool laidback triplet swing feel. Goes down easy! cheers, -Tom
  19. You could substitute some wheat grass, kale, chia seeds, flax oil, and kelp . . . for the chocolate ice cream. Then go out for dessert at Baskin Robbins.
  20. I think it fits that drawing very well! Something was going on in the wide panning, some creepy atonal blender. Nice . . . certainly sets its own limits. The windchimes perhaps a bit much? Are windchimes the musical cliche that a cowbell has become? Perhaps I just had a traumatic windchime experience as a child. Off to therapy now. Still a fun listen! cheers, -Tom
×
×
  • Create New...