Starship Krupa

You haven't heard my drumming! ?In the 10 years since I took up that instrument, I consider it am achievement that more people have invited me to play than have asked me not to play. As a guitarist, well, I'm probably a good guy to jam with because I'm unlikely to try to take a solo on unfamiliar material (although I can do that well enough on keys, where I've learned my scales). I understand theory better than most underground rockers of my acquaintance, but that's because so few of them understand any at all. I think I'm getting fairly okay at understanding and executing mixing concepts, but I wouldn't have asked you for stems if I didn't think I needed the practice myself. ?

Sure, why not? As one who has a dedicated switch box so that I can try my mixes out on all 4 of my sets of monitors, I say the more the merrier. The more speakers/systems you listen on, the more likely you'll flush out EQ issues.

IME, as long as you have a receipt from an official retailer hardware companies will honor the bundling deal. Open box or not. But here's hoping the the previous buyer didn't get around to registering it.

Did they? I was unaware of that. Completely different? I never used SONAR X3, but my understanding is that Cakewalk by BandLab was originally based on the SONAR X series code. Of course, I was never aware of anything called "CbB Sonar Platinum," is that something that BandLab did before the Cakewalk by BandLab that was based on the SONAR code and has been under active development for 4 years came out?

And in this case, "great" means "one that people want to listen to over and over." So true. Chart numbers only pique interest; you can get all the exposure in the world, but if people hear what you do and don't want more of it, you're sunk.

I can't imagine why you would be embarrassed about sending stems of your dry vocals for a relative stranger to listen to solo'd up on a very revealing monitor playback system. ? (Just upgraded my interface and then spent a couple of days restoring a vintage Crown D-150 to use as my studio amp and I can suddenly hear all manner of reverb tails, transients and trippy little stereo effects in records I thought I was familiar with) I've told you before that I think your vocals have character and they will sound even better with judicious application of psychedelic era Beatle-y processing. Whenever you're ready, buddy.

I don't understand precisely what you mean. On my system, with both Track and Console open, the buttons on the FX racks follow each other no matter the state. They dim when the rack is bypassed and turn grey when the individual effect is bypassed. Are you using a custom theme, by any chance?

I just upgraded to an interface with more flexible routing, and yes, I'm ready to try patching in some outboard gear. However deeply it's baked into the code, there is some demand here. Friendly bump.

Re: James Hargreaves video. The "UK Chart" that he says his song got on was "Physical Singles." I can't imagine that it represents a huge market. Was it bracing for this plug-in 'ho to watch this guy demonstrate getting his sounds using the ugly-***** DXi stock Vegas FX? Anyone here use Vegas ExpressFX on their master bus? Good lord. Re: The Troll. Yeah, it was. Obviously, with the hit-and-run, he's not interested in an actual discussion. Bonus, though, and one of the things about this forum that continues to amaze me, is that a troll post didn't wreck the thread, rather it was fertilizer for a pretty interesting discussion. Are we all enough veterans of online forums that we know better than to get wound up and launch ad hominem attacks at trolls? I used one of my favorite anti-troll tactics, which was to ask them to elaborate. In my long experience, that's a troll kryptonite. Stay reasonably polite, keep asking them reasonable questions. Re: @Philip G Hunt's excellent points, #7 is especially important. Once you get the attention/success you think you want, will you be able to embrace it and live with it? As Spock wisely put it, it is often better to want a thing than to get it. I'll add that it's best to figure out as much as possible what you want from a music career. "To earn a decent living" is NOT enough. There are many avenues for musicians to take toward this goal. Member of live touring band, sessions, teaching, casuals. One thing I know about myself is that my creative process takes a long time. If I were in a situation where I had to cough up new gems every few months, that would be hell on earth. So I have to pull back. What is success for me at this point in my life? First I want to make music that pleases me. Next I want to put music out that people enjoy and I would also in some way like to connect with the people who enjoy it. The pie-in-the-blue-sky goal would be to be able to take the stage in front of an enthusiastic audience (this is the least realistic goal, but I would love to make it happen). If I make any money at all from the process, that's gravy. That's why Bandcamp plus a YouTube video for each song suits me. With Bandcamp and YouTube, it's easy to know what reach you have with each song. You know how many times it's been played and/or purchased. When I was putting together hobby bands, I took my goals one at a time. If we managed to get a club to book us so we can play in front of people, that was success. If we got more shows, success. Get a following, success. Record a decent-sounding demo, success, get it played on the radio, success. With my last band, those were the boxes I ticked before Philip's point #7 seized the other members and they wandered off. And I'm happy with that. How many people dream of doing those things and never get to do them? I've played on stages in San Francisco! I've heard myself on the radio! I put together a cool band, wrote songs and played lead guitar! When I watch other musicians playing, I've felt the strange autopilot in-the-moment bubble they're inside, a feeling like no other. That zone which is outside of normal perception of time and space. How many people get to feel what that's like?

Ah, so it seems to be that they decided to put up the bundle installer so that those of us with anything from it could access it, and stripped the serial requirement out of everything. That would imply that I still only technically have licenses for the two PB freebies in the package, and the other ones just happen to work. Ah well, I'll use the other things in the bundle, and if the software police come and knock on my door I'll plead confusion and point to this thread as proof of my attempt at diligence. The owners of the products are probably too busy bathing in Dom Perignon while lighting cigars with $100 bills to assemble a legal team to come and get me.

Odd, it's showing up over here. Maybe rescan all?

Okay, I see. If you scroll allllllll the way to the bottom of the product page they say that it comes in VST and AU, but it doesn't say how to get the plug-in version. The button makes the cursor change to the hand, but clicking does nothing. However: when installing it on my laptop I watched the installer shell closely and saw that at the very end, it installs a VST3. It just doesn't allow you the options that installer shells usually do. I rarely install standalones. Anyway, this is an amazing-sounding plug-in, quite worthy of being payware. A set of pianos and strings that sound this good and the download is only about 210MB. And it did its job well, too: I bought a Studiologic SL880 20 years ago, best action ev-ar from a weighted controller, so I was interested to see what Fatar/Studiologic were up to. Turns out they've been busy. Keyboard controllers still, of course, but now they have many more really good-looking synths, pianos, and a compact drawbar-equipped clonewheel organ. Brian "Oblivion" Auger is the star endorser. If I were gigging on keys, I'd surely look closer. They obviously have some talent coding their sound generators.

Dang, this is sounding like the best piano I've heard, taking that spot away from Monastery Grand. If only it were available as a VSTi.

I already had an account due to a couple of freebies they gave out a while back and clicking on the link went right to a sign-in and the download page, does anyone know the exact legal status here? Are they granting licenses only to people already registered at their site, or are they casting them to the wind? I don't know if it's within the terms for me to have the ZIP file on my computer and give it to a friend with a thumb drive or whatever. I never received or read anything that would even indicate that I now have licenses for the whole bundle. All I know is that the installer was there for the downloading and it seemed to install the whole kaboodle with no requests for serial number or email address. I want to avoid engaging in SOFTWARE PIRACY.

This is kinda blowing me away. The ERA Voice Bundle was something I used to fantasize about having, like if I worked in a well-funded production studio. Years ago I had some audio that was clipped for some reason and went looking for a de-clipping solution and happened on their site, it was like looking in the window of a fancy car dealership. I'll get out the crowbar and open my wallet for something I know I'll use on almost every project, like mpressor or Nimbus Reverb, but I can't justify specialized tools that I might use twice in a year. This giveaway, along with those from ToneBoosters and BlueLab....why would anyone need to buy fancy plug-ins except to collect the set and fondle the shiny GUI's (which is an urge that I get)? What's next, Gullfoss for free? Sonarworks?

It's poo. Check my review on KVR. Freebie or not, how do they come off calling this thing a "beta" that's "using the latest modelling technology?" Nothing wrong with .SF2, but it's not even the latest sampling technology. Most of the controls in the UI either don't move or don't have any effect on the sound, which....sounds like a drum kit, I'll give it that. One with the kick level way out of balance with the snare, and other elements panned too far with no way to change it. Most of the labels on the controls don't match what's in the brief manual. Worst, it uses a non-standard drum mapping, so you can't just drop it on a GM'd track to check out how it sounds. I'd call it somewhere between "mockup" and "alpha" using the dev phase naming I'm familiar with. It's the first time I've seen a password protected .ZIP since I was doing in-house QA. Maybe the password is there to protect you from wasting time with this. Avoid avoid avoid.

With the release of the ERA 6 suite as freeware, I don't believe I'll be checking this out. I do like W.A. Production's UI's though.

Ah jeez, it IS a Jag....and looking again, Rick from Underworld has all of his hair. I think I'm losing it. Guys, am I losing it? ? Well-spotted, Kenny, as I would expect from someone with your handle. Let's put 'er under the guitar geek microscope. Let's set this record really straight, because looking closer, this is actually a very interesting guitar in the world of vintage Fenders. Put a big "as you know" in front of what I'm typing below. I'm not a vintage guitar dude myself, but I think they're cool, especially the weirder Fenders. I have in my collection a silver sparkle mother-of-bass-boat Squier Jagmaster from when they were making them with full-scale necks. I used to have a 70's Musicmaster and the scale just never feel right. I was trying to emulate Adrian Belew, but his "Mustangs" were customs with Strat scale necks and Kahler whammies. Go figure. About our specimen. First, "pickup" not plural. Closer paused video inspection suggests he's got it in the 'Halen kustom konfig: bridge pickup is from another guitar wired directly to vol pot via mismatched knob (from a Fender amp, pre-CBS we hope). Neck pickup and all other electronics, pickup selector, thumbwheel tone pots, etc. have been yanked, leaving the chrome plates as you pointed out with empty holes in them and an empty cavity at the base of the neck. Interestingly, there seems to be a second 1/4" jack on the lower rear control plate, so maybe that missing neck pickup had its own output before it was removed, for, uh, stereo. The direct-wired lipsticker would account for the full, chunky tone he's getting. ? The neck and body are what make it very interesting, rare even, if original. The neck's dot inlays with binding suggest 1965-66, and that particular configuration was only around for about a year before Fender switched to block inlays. It's a transitional guitar. The neck and headstock look to be in fairly okay shape. As for the body, danged if it doesn't look like Olympic White over a sunburst. Maybe someone was a Beach Boys fan, Carl's Jag and Al's matching Strat being Olympic White. Unless someone attacked it with a white spray can at some point in its history, a factory spray-over (often done when someone ordered a custom color, as any white finish would have been in 1966) raises the level of collectability. This "roached-out" axe could actually be a '66 factory custom worth some decent change today, even in its beat-to-hell state. Yikes! (You can order a brand new guitar from the Fender Custom Shop that would look very similar to this one (minus the deletion of the electronics, although they'd probably do that for you, too). People pay more to have Fender first make it a sunburst (nitro!)and then spray over the sunburst with white paint (more nitro!) and then attack it with abrasives and bits of metal to make it look like a road-worn veteran that someone else ordered custom in 1966. I have held such instruments in my hands at the NAMM Show and they are uncanny. In more ways than one.) Here's a shot where you can see "Jag" on the headstock, the amp knob, and the sunburst finish showing through on the lower left bout:

Holy carp! I'm able to zoom in on this image! From the start with this forum, clicking on embedded images has frustrated me, because they just opened in the same size. Now when I click on an embedded image I can actually zoom in on it. There's a secret to it, though, you must initially click near the edge of the image. If you click the center, it does the useless behavior I'm used to. Long nightmare over.

From the start of this forum, clicking on embedded images has frustrated me, they just opened up in a separate window at the same resolution as the embedded version. But either this has changed or I was just clicking in the wrong place on the image. Now when I click on an embedded image I can actually zoom in on it rather than just clicking and getting the same size. There's a secret to it, though, you must initially click near the edge of the image. If you click the center, it does the useless behavior I'm used to.

OMG, did something change with the forum software? I just discovered that when I click on an embedded image I can actually zoom in on it rather than continuously clicking and getting the same size. There's a secret to it, though, you must initially click near the edge of the image. If you click the center, it does the useless behavior I'm used to. Has it always been this way and I was just clicking in the center (I know, foolish me)?

This is a great-looking theme, I like your colors (assuming you're going to replace the Tungsten Orange with your violet), the full-bleed Control Bar modules, and your iconography. And yes, you've hit the wall as far as those colors you indicate. TYLIP covers it all, to the best of our ability so far. Pretty much if it ain't in there, it ain't themeable. Will you make this theme available for public consumption?

Very nice. I would love to do a gig like that. As yet, I don't have the live electronica chops to do it. I think Underworld and Fat Boy Slim pioneered Middle-aged Baldycore. They paved the way for the rest of us. Middle-aged baldies are able to understand how heartbreaking the lyrics to Born Slippy NUXX actually are:

Oh that is some ferocity. I love their setup. You kinda know they're gonna be great before they play a note. Roached-out modded Jazzmaster indicates Sonic Youth/My Bloody Valentine influence, chanted monotone vox drug reference lyrics (album title Pinned? Subtle?) and pile-driving floor tom riding lady drummer, Velvets. Oh, drummer is not only great musician, but also sweetie pie. And they're pedal builders! I love how this ferocious band are so "aw shucks" and don't cop attitudes. Something I noticed when I was doing amp repair from 2005-2020, the dudes who came in who were covered with tattoos and piercings and brought me these 250W pant-flapping bass amps were also invariably the sweetest, soft-spoken people. It was obvious that whatever angst and aggression they were harboring was being successfully expressed onstage. And kids are so darn nice these days! @Tim Smith, I don't know how old you are, but back when I was in my 20's and playing in bands, the idea of jamming with someone 10 years older than us was like the idea of jamming with a hippie corpse. And we all had to cop this "fsck it" attitude. I did push back on that somewhat. Well, not only do they not make kids like they used to, they don't make old farts like they used to either. We make more of an effort to stay cool, and I think sometimes we're respected as the people who pioneered the music they're influenced by. When I tell someone half my age that I had a Lush/MBV-influenced shoegaze band in the early 90's, they think that's way cool. Yeah, dig dig dig. Thanks. P.S. If you want to check out a band with a similar configuration, but the lady drummer sings lead and sounds like Sandy Denny, try Heron Oblivion. The bass player was a repair client of mine.

Heh, just like it's been since I can remember, with the big difference being that now you CAN find things yourself. A friend once called me "one of those annoying glass half-full people." Guilty as charged. A Place To Bury Strangers, eh? Blew The Black Angels off the stage, eh? They seem like my kind of toublemakers.? Not surprised you already dug MUGSTAR. Ever hear their version of "Tam Lin?"