hockeyjx

Now it is worth it! Thanks @Kirean !

I look at that as "if I could paint the Mona Lisa once, I would". There is a difference between creation and touring; and I certainly don't envy artists(especially in the modern day) needing to make a living touring. I've always had a grandiose idea of music, and never cared if I could reproduce it live. But there are those that only want to do it if they can do it live (as it appears that Terry is in that camp). No wrong or right ...except to what we would PAY for.

The touring takes a toll for rock music. I still haven't seen rock singer at 70 that was as good as they were at even 50. Steve Perry, Paul Stanley, Bon Jovi, Axl Rose etc etc etc They can do it in the studio, but not for 2+ hours onstage for 100 dates.

And one of the BIGGEST REASONS: They sang at the high end of their range, or over it, and you don't keep that for too long in this life!

Like the farse that is Foreigner????? That is crazy.

Ozzy was tuning down to like C#, and all the songs sound nothing like they should (especially the first 2 albums in standard). Paul Stanley was embarrassing himself for the last 3 years of KI$$ (and relying on a guide vocal). Bon Jovi flat out stole money the last tour he did (and he was never the best singer in Bon Jovi anyway). King's X still is decent, but dUg can't hit the highs anymore, and I can't blame him ...because he's 74!!!! But at least their tickets are ridiculously priced. I get a half-step for touring (say Toad the Wet Sprocket and Vertical Horizon for a couple), but they still sound good.

Sadly, the older I get, the more I won't go and see "legacy" 80's bands live. 90 times out of a 100, it is primarily because the singer has lost too many steps, and they tune a step down(sometimes to the absolute detriment of the songs). I believe too many bands of that era (and shoot, throw in some 90's bands as well) are just NOT that good live, and disappoint me. I can't spend high cash for mediocrity (though cheap cash is ok). Am I the only one that feels this way? Am I a jerk(rhetorical)?

100%

@Jim Roseberry What I'm really saying is that the Turbo Frequency probably isn't needed for a DAW on a 14900k. I have an 11 gen intel, and I'm nowhere to hitting rim on a synth-laden project. Memory, percentage-wise, is a bigger hog than CPU. We all have different work flows; and lord knows I like to tinker and get max efficiency, but I don't feel like it is even needed these days. That said, I'd still tinker 🤫

I don't see the value in overclocking a decent current processor for a DAW at this point in time, I'd rather just add as much memory as can. YMMV

My favorite KI$$ album as well!

For me (and this includes my early influences, and excluding classics like Dark Side of the Moon): Ace Frehley and KI$$' Dynasty made me pick up the guitar to start George Lynch and Dokken's Back for the Attack made me put everything in to overdrive Then, some that really have done it for me since: Depeche Mode - Violator Days of the New - Green Duncan Sheik - Humming Devin Townsend - Addicted! Vertical Horizon - Everything You Want Toad the Wet Sprocket - Coil

I have two from the late 80's/early 90's Depeche Mode: yes, they had been around for a few over a decade. But Violator reached a level of sophistication that hasn't been topped since in that genre IMO. Listening to that today, 35 years later, I feel the same way: In the late 80's, a friend had this before EPIC hit, and I was enthralled with the blend of different styles of synth/guitar/deep lyrics(read: not girls and blow)and the variety of Mike Patton's voices. The Real Thing is a MONSTER album, and dare I say, the best version of War Pigs:

I can't have you do that @Rain

You have a good woman! All about the adventure.