Jump to content

Vernon Barnes

Members
  • Posts

    1,119
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Vernon Barnes

  1. 30 minutes ago, Fleer said:

    Seems interesting indeed, but I’m getting a very synthy feeling from the vids. 

    It is, but it seems very good for highly effected parts, it will have its uses! I managed to pick it up for$17.02 +VAT, less some loyally points from Best Service.

    • Like 1
    • Great Idea 2
  2. So how does this compare to the vast plethora of other Minimoog emulations? My favourite is GForce Minimonsta, Softube's is probably more authentic (and you can use the modules in Modular). NI's Monark is also reasonably authentic. Cherry Audio's take is cheap as chips.

    • Like 2
    • Great Idea 1
  3. 1 hour ago, TheSteven said:

    This any better that the GForce String Machine?

    Different. Gforce is more geared towards recreating classic string machine sounds where EW have taken a different road and its quite successful,

    There is not the same range of raw material as GForce and there is no filter section but with four layers some very diverse sounds can be set up.  EW is less tweakable but It sounds good straight out of the box.

    • Like 4
  4. 3 hours ago, Frank said:

     

    ADDED Kontakt can now be used directly with KONTROL MK3 keyboards

    Does this mean you can get NKS functionality without Komplete Kontrol? That would (almost)  be worth getting a MK3 keyboard for. I always hoped they would implement that for the older keyboards.

  5. 2 hours ago, Kirean said:

    I guess the bigger question is also that can you actually tweak the sounds to get outlandish and outrageous results or is it, just like you said, more of an inspiration machine than a stand-alone, fully fledged synth?

    Probably not your goto for sound design. You can edit envelopes and filter settings etc. but you are constrained by the original sample in the patch and the fixed architecture. That said the tweakability will be sufficient for many people.  The layering expands the range of sounds too. But outrageous and outlandish is stretching it.

  6. First impressions. There are some nice sounds in here, while the default interface screen is a bit naf, clicking on the instrument illustration beings up the editing parameters for that layer which are on a par with a lot of sample bases synths with volume and filter envelopes, filter types and filter cutoff, resonance and drive  etc. so there is scope for sound shaping but sounds will of course be limited to the original sample.

    Where as SA3 has a second simple bass layer here we have two full layers with separate editable parameters. As far as this type of sample based synth goes it is pretty versatile.  IK Syntronic is the obvious comparison. SA4s browser is easier and Syntronic requires you to layer in a multi, which sounds best will be a matter of personal taste.  SA3 has some nice touches if you are looking for "happy accidents"

    A downside for me  with most libraries of this type is browsing through a zillion presets looking for a start point. NKS compatibility or at least NKS style audio previews would be useful.

  7. 10 hours ago, Promidi said:

    Can someone who has SA4 on UVIWorkstation 3.1.12 and select any 28. machine preset and post what happens.

    When I select any 28. machine preset,  I get SA4 display an error mesage "Unable to load the convolution reverb data from'SFalcon
    Resources.ufs/Samples/Convolver/Speaker/Champion.wav'" and "Unable to load the convolution reverb data from'SFalcon
    Resources.ufs/Samples/Convolver/Speaker/bass Green.wav'"

    I have reported this to UVI support but I just want to make sure it's not just me.

    I am getting this too.

    I have Sonic Pass and have everything installed and upto date so its not like its looking for something in an uninstalled library.

    I am also seeing the same problem in Falcon.

  8. 34 minutes ago, Fleer said:

    Don’t know but I seem to be the only living boy in NY not liking those Roland drum boxes. 

    I had a 303, a 606 and an 505, I was glad to move on, as particularly with drums, I prefer acoustic kit sounds. 

    I can't ever see me using any samples or emulations of this generation of drum sounds.  They are not attractive to me, but good on anyone who wants to use them.

    • Like 2
  9. I suppose its inevitable they would do this one at some stage. I used to have the original hardware and sold it when the second hand price was at its rock bottom. If I had waited a bit I could have made a fair bit of cash.

    I have a couple of emulations I never use so I am in no hurry to jump on this one.

     

  10. I tried the demo a while back. It's a beast with a price tag to match. It sounds great but I think it's for a real organist with the hardware and chops to do it justice. 

    Most of us mortals are probably better with some of the Kontakt pipe organs.

    • Like 1
  11. Brings the sub in line with a WUPed perpetual licence. If you are WUPed you get a second licence. 

    I use a dongle, much less likely to go wrong than a hard drive.

    Before I retired I managed around 50 dongle based licences (not music, eack licence $7.5K) used in locations around the world. These were moved from location to location frequently. We lost two in ten years, one we knew was stolen and another lost in international shipping.  So I don't consider them that vulnerable.

    • Like 2
  12. 5 hours ago, audioschmaudio said:

    It's one of the many products that I got with Total Studio 3.5 MAX. I didn't pay it much attention because that type of instrument sounds so old school to me, like it's got this 70ies TV quiz show background music vibe, I can't imagine it in a modern production. What kind of genres does one use it for? I see it's very popular here, so I guess I underestimated it's potential. 

    It a very versatile instrument. Yes it can do the 70 quiz sound but so much more. A staple of  jazz,  soul and prog rock. Jon Lord of Deep Purple used it very effectivly for heavy rock. You do hear it on current records occasionally but I see no reason it can't be used in almost any genre.

    I think the appeal is in the organic ( no pun intended) sound of the electro mechanical tone wheels, something that has not been perfectly emulated until recently along with the mechanical rotary Leslie speaker.

    IK have got the closest yet.

    • Like 5
  13. On 7/28/2023 at 3:52 PM, fret_man said:

    I usually use my normal notation program (Finale in my case) and export MIDI from that. I can then click drag the MIDI into an empty Studio One track and there it all is!

    It depends on your workflow. I work differently in that I write in the DAW, either recording MIDI or in the piano roll or score editor. I then send tracks to Notion to create a score for colaborators. I find it excellent as chords from the chord track and any lyrics are transfered across seamlessly.

    I have not really looked into transferring in the opposite direction.

×
×
  • Create New...