All Activity

Check your emails.

Try selecting your Melodyne "rendered" clip and bounce it to "clips" first , before further editing.

Oops, I keep forgetting about that. Oh well 😒

Password resets have to be processed manually. The automated method does not work. To reset your Cakewalk password, send an email to support@cakewalk.com and they will get you sorted.

Well, my thread about the Steinberg vouchers disappeared, so I'm sure this one will too. So bizarre.

Derived from their new instrument Stratum. A free version for K7 (full) in the Klang series from Cinematique Instruments. https://cinematique-instruments.com/sites2025/instr_stratum.php

https://soundcloud.com/user-936763372-896820317/she-doesnt-want-you?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing&si=93d4cfba97f44e69881a4b94340332c5

https://audiodeluxe.com/collections/on-sale/products/uvi-usq-1 Pick one of two for FREE Free UVI Model D Free W.A. Production MultiBender

If you’re doing that on the legacy Cakewalk site because you want to activate Splat, 8.5 or a previous version, then you won’t. Only Support can do that with the necessary proof. Have you tried reaching out to them here ? As you’re posting here in the Sonar part of this new site I’m assuming you’re mixing Sonars up. The new Cakewalk Sonar has, apart from some legacy code, nothing to do with the previous versions, is sub based and needs you to be part of Bandlab. If you were referring to Cakewalk by Bandlab or Cakewalk Sonar, simply login to the Bandlab website, go to your account and change your password there or apply for a password reset from them. Then you’ll get a mail ! And can use the new creds to login to the two apps cited. Suggestion : If you don’t have a Bandlab account then create one so you can download and install the most recent version of CbB (which is free and much much better than the legacy versions mentioned above). However you will not have any legacy vst’s that came with those versions you may want to get back. J

@FreeEarCandy one of my favourites from the album, sounds like a very respectful cover.

Yes, grab the handle at the top to increased or decrease overall height.

In the new Sonar’s console view, are the mixing sliders resizable yet?

I hope this 6' 42" video brings you some transcendence, peace and a short escape from the chaos and darkness that politics is bringing to our beautiful world. https://www.jerrygerber.com/video/Across the Universe.mp4

.

To be fair, those are gas powered Bob! 😁

https://www.ikmultimedia.com/news/?id=TotalMarchMAXness2025 *JamPoints accepted for this promo in the IK store. *Sale through April 14, 2025.

Short answer is the Focusrite control is severely lacking, for me anyway. To explain better, My old trusty echo Layla 3G had the perfect PC app-you could see EVERYTHING all at once, You can adjust everything easily. The focusrite 3r gen 18i20 with a similar interface would be ok. But also I monitor thru a mixer and use the OUTS from each channel into the mixer to monitor in the room when creating\learning whatever. The output signal from the outs of the 18i20 are so low it's basically useless my needs. Of course hen recording I use headphones. so mainly the computer interface (focusrite control) just sucks imho. Sad because the hardware itself is fine except for the low output I mentioned but I could live with that if the interface were better. I definitely will not be buying any bus powered AI. I know the SSL 18 would be super overkill for me but the PC interface is perfect. I sold a guitar I didn't use anymore so I do have the $$$ but of course they are not in stock yet. I appreciate all the input and advice folks so thanks very much.

I assume you checked your spam folder?

Does anyone know why when I ask to reset my password I am not getting a email?

The sneak peek videos for Scaler 3 cover a lot of territory.

At the time I was investigating this, I was unable to find a hi-res MIDI file to play with so I created my own by copying the velocity lane in the controllers pane of the PRV to a CC88 lane and sliding the resulting controllers 1 tick earlier. If the original MIDI perfromance was played live, the velocities will be variable so the CC88 values will as well. Without getting too far into the weeds, my conclusiion was that hi-res velocity was of no value when playing Pianoteq in particular because the inherently variable response it produces as a phycially modeled instrument swamped the much smaller level of variability due to the finer gradations of velocity. Moreover, I'm not convinced that any keyboard player on the planet has the level of control and repeatability necessary to take advantage of higher velocity resolution. There's an argument to be made that even uncontrolled/random variation at a fine level might add some "life" to a piano or synth patch that might otherwise sound mechanical due to producing the exact same response to the same velocity every time, but some instruments already address that by "round-robin" samples or physically modeled randomness as in the case of Pianoteq, and if they don't, they probably won't repond to hi-res MIDI anyway!

Yes, for the most part. You just end up with an Event List that shows a CC88 message right before every Note event. But Sonar currently ignores Note Off velocity and always sends a neutral value of 64, so it will record the CC88 controllers that a Hi-Res-capable keyboard sends right before a Note Off and show them in the Event List even though it doesn't show separate Note Off messages or allow editing them other than indirectly by changing the duration of a Note event.

Interesting question. I have no idea, but I can only assume if you have a controller that sends out CC88 data and a synth that interprets it as extended range velocity information, playing back the recorded MIDI data should allow the synth to do what you want. Again, I have no idea, but I like the question. [EDIT OUT based on David Baay's explanation of the CC88 data.] If you (or anyone else), has some note data that has the CC88 velocity extended range, I'd be interested to see what it looks like and play around with it to see what I might want to map the CC88 data to (purely as a hobbyist).

well, it's better than my guitar playing, and the instrument is better than my electric guitar, a modified firstact i found at goodwill... (i don't use it much once i got a used ibanez 6 string bass that i can lay on my lap to play using the closest frets tot he bridtge for guitar parts and then the normal frets for bass stuff but i can only play one or two strings at at ime. ).

Thanks for confirming this. I assumed this was the case based on your prior reference to "the CC88 implementation" but the clarification is good to know.