Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not really, because more and more instantaneous amplitude information is being thrown away as fewer bits are used to represent it at lower and lower levels. Applying gain to a low level signal just gives you a louder representation of a poorly detailed signal. This might not be too egregious for the first 24-30dB of attenuation, but the lower you go, the noisier it will get.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, sjoens said:

True, you can't gain back what's no longer there.  But I was curious about the process more than sound quality.

I mean, you could do a counter-gain/volume envelope on audio that has a pre-existing fade printed on it. You'll raise the noise floor the whole time though.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

It's only a couple of years ago that we were all saying "Demix an existing stereo recording ? IMPOSSIBLE ! That will never happen!"
Then AI systems came along...

... so perhaps this is one for future days... (..er...months?? )
 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I did this years ago with "old" technology using fade or gain envelopes that were configured to operate that way.  But I don't remember what app I used.  Maybe another DAW or plugin?  Apparently Audacity can do it but I've not been able to make it work.

All the envelope would need is a start and end dB value.

Edited by sjoens
Posted (edited)

Unless I missed something, the current problem with fades is they start or end at 0 dB.  If the zero point could be adjusted that would solve it.

Like John said tho, I may be able to do it with volume envelopes & bouncing pretty easily.

Edited by sjoens
Posted (edited)
On 11/9/2023 at 4:18 AM, Jonathan Sasor said:

you could do a counter-gain/volume envelope on audio that has a pre-existing fade printed on it.

This works well for my needs. Thanks John.

Sometimes the obvious isn't so obvious... to me. 9_9

 

Edited by sjoens

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...