Tim Godfrey Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 (edited) The Downloadable Documentation for Cakewalk at the bottom of this page does not have any bookmarks for navigating the almost 2000 page PDF. There is a table of contents at the front, but the Bookmarks tree is much better for navigating a large document because it is always visible, so you don't have to scroll to the front and back all the time. Please add the Bookmarks to the PDF. This is what I mean by bookmarks. A collapsible tree to the side of the document pane, and clicking on any item takes you to that item in the main document. Edited October 29, 2022 by Tim Godfrey 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User 905133 Posted October 29, 2022 Share Posted October 29, 2022 (edited) I agree that a hierarchical table of contents possibly with indented, collapsible topics and subtopics would be useful. If time is going to be spent making it happen, I would prefer it to be done in a table of contents navigation frame with the online documentation which is far more useful to many than a PDF reference guide. Edited October 29, 2022 by User 905133 fixed a typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Fogle Posted October 30, 2022 Share Posted October 30, 2022 @User 905133, While it's nice that both offline and online documentation is available I don't agree that this thread about offline documentation is the proper place to present a suggestion concerning online documentation. It shouldn't be an either /or situation like you presented. I hope you will start a new thread so I and others can discuss your idea in more detail. I do support the original suggestion of bookmarks in the offline PDF manual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User 905133 Posted October 30, 2022 Share Posted October 30, 2022 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Jim Fogle said: @User 905133, While it's nice that both offline and online documentation is available I don't agree that this thread about offline documentation is the proper place to present a suggestion concerning online documentation. It shouldn't be an either /or situation like you presented. I agree it shouldn't be an either/or situation. I have no reason to make a feature request. Quote If time is going to be spent making it happen, I would prefer it to be done in a table of contents navigation frame with the online documentation which is far more useful to many than a PDF reference guide. I can accept a rule that no one should comment on any one else's feature request if that is to be the rule. From what I have seen though, commenting on suggestions made by others happens. Just to be clear, I use both offline and online documentation based on which one would meet my needs at the moment. However, based on what I have read in the forum, I am sure some people prefer one over the other. I disagree that I did anything improper. I did not say it should be one or the other. Edited October 30, 2022 by User 905133 word change (wrong --> improper) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Fogle Posted October 30, 2022 Share Posted October 30, 2022 (edited) @User 905133, I understood the time constraint you emphasized in the quote above as an either / or constraint. If I came across as argumentative, that's my mistake and I apologize. I agree with you that you did not do anything improper. My comment should not be considered as a forum "rule". I meant it as a suggestion given for consideration. When several forum members comment on a singular topic it is easier for me to follow. But when the comments flow outside the topic boundaries I sometimes find it difficult to match each comment to a particular subject. My thought is it is fairly easy for a good suggestion to be overlooked when the idea is presented in a thread I don't associate with the idea. Again, I apologize. Edited October 30, 2022 by Jim Fogle clarification Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User 905133 Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 Oh. Maybe I misread what you wrote. I thought you were saying my comment was not appropriate. Thanks for clarifying that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weltergeist Posted November 28, 2023 Share Posted November 28, 2023 (edited) deleted Edited December 5, 2023 by weltergeist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Vere Posted November 28, 2023 Share Posted November 28, 2023 They must have hired new staff because the PDF manual for Next , which is only 256 pages, the index takes you to the page. So a click in the help menu, short scroll to index one more click and there’s you info and very clear and easy to understand. So possibly this feature request can be transferred to the new Sonar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weltergeist Posted December 1, 2023 Share Posted December 1, 2023 (edited) deleted Edited December 5, 2023 by weltergeist deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now