bitflipper

We're apparently talking about different things. I'm sure if you suggested an experiment that demonstrates samples loading on an archived track, that would clear up the misunderstanding.

As noted above, this is how all synths work. MIDI volume and pan instructions are just part of the data stream and directed to whatever channel you've designated. (Yes, multi-timbral synths such as the TTS-1 would be exceptions, as they can act as multiple synths on multiple MIDI channels. But in your scenario that would be an overly complicated way to get it done.) If none of these tracks play concurrently, meaning each one is truly a different part of the melody with little or no overlap, then all you have to do is automate volume and pan. It doesn't matter which track you put the automation on. You could even put the automation onto its own track if you like.

How can it do that if the instrument itself isn't loaded into RAM? Who's doing the loading?

This is why I advocate for deeply learning whatever tools you have rather than jumping on every shiny new product that comes along. That goes for the most mundane effects as well as complex synths and sample libraries, not just to uncover their quirks but also for the joy of discovering capabilities you didn't know were in there. This has made me wonder why no developer has ever utilized keyswitch velocity to bundle in additional information. For example, a keyswitch that triggers a note bend articulation could use its velocity to indicate the bend depth or rate. AFAIK, nobody has ever done that.

Archive the track. That's specifically what it's for.

I just tested this with Kontakt, and it didn't care if the keyswitch's velocity was 0 or not. I'm guessing the issue is specific to VSL and possibly some other synths as well. I recall that with some older hardware synths, a velocity of zero was interpreted as a muted note or a note-off message. Maybe this should be reported to VSL as a possible bug, or maybe it's intentional to give you a way to non-destructively bypass keyswitches.

Articulation maps have inspired me to start using Kirk Hunter Concert Strings again. The sheer number (literally hundreds) of keyswitches in that library could turn a fun process into drudgery, especially when displaying multiple sections at once in the PRV. It'd end up looking like spaghetti, with viola switches intermingled with cello notes and bass keyswitches mixed up with violin notes. BTW, I don't complain about Italian terminology. At least it's more or less phonetic. Musicologists could have settled on French or Russian instead! Still doesn't explain why I have to order a plain old cup of drip coffee as if I was a tourist in Italy.

Wait, he's Chris Rock's kid?

Depends. If you already have the compressor dialed in perfectly and don't want to mess with it anymore, use its output volume slider. Otherwise, turn down the bus input gain.

I'd set the 0dB/-10dB switch to 0dB unless you're using the mic on a particularly loud source, such as 1" from a guitar cabinet or inside a bass drum. The switch with a line icon is for engaging a high-pass filter. Use the filter (choose the non-flat-line setting) for most things, especially vocals.

Yeh, I'm still a Spectrasonics fan boy. I just checked my most recently worked-on project, and although Kontakt remains king here, Spectrasonics is all over it. No Trilian on this one, though. For this one I used Orange Tree's Jaco. Here's the VI list: Omnisphere x 5 Keyscape Kontakt x 9 Zebra2 x 4 Superior Drummer IKM Hammond B-3X SWAM Alto Sax Why so many instruments? Half of these fall under the category of "ear candy", decorations that only happen once or twice in the song. Omnisphere is great for that. I use separate instances so that I can freeze as I go. It's mainly a piano piece, so of course Keyscape's Steinway is the centerpiece.

I love a mystery, but by this point I'd have just chalked it up to "I guess I'll never know" and moved on. I commend your tenacity, but maybe there are greater mysteries deserving of your attention. Like what, exactly, is Kid Rock's talent?

Installed the update and was reminded of another Spectrasonics annoyance - the need to re-authorize after every update. I just went through this a couple weeks ago when I moved Trilian and Omnisphere to another drive. Sneeze, and you have to re-authorize. Anyhow, I checked my version numbers and did indeed need to re-install the patch library but not the samples.

No, no no. I'm saying Trilian is a demanding instrument. Any improvements are welcome!

The notes don't make it clear if we need to download the patches and samples, too, or just the DLL.

I'll believe it when I see it. User-friendliness isn't exactly Spectrasonic's forte. I'll be downloading the update today, regardless. Anything that improves that resource hog's efficiency will be much appreciated. Although I use it a lot, the decision to do so is often predicated on track count. Combine Trilian with Omnisphere and you can almost hear the CPU wheezing from the effort.

It's a channel strip. A very good one, but just one of many on the market. Cheap, too, when on sale. [Just checked; it's a bargain right now for $45] Personally, I'm not a fan of channel strips. Sure, there's the convenience factor. But I prefer to combine my favorite individual effects in any signal chain. A couple potential alternatives: Cakewalk's own VX-64 is comparable but not identical, lacking a gate but adding an expander. Unfortunately, it's not sold separately so you'll need to have SONAR installed to have it. iZotope's versatile Neutron is fancier than Omni Channel, adding a visual parametric EQ and a transient designer. It's not designed specifically for vocals, but its sibling Nectar is. These are just the first two that come to mind. There are a great many more out there, including modular FX racks such as McDSP's 6050 and Slate's VMR that let you basically build your own channel strip. But I suspect that if you polled serious mixers the consensus would be that they generally don't use channel strips. Some top-tier vendors such as FabFilter don't even make one. Even Meldaproduction, which makes every kind of effect you've ever heard of and a few you haven't, doesn't make a channel strip. However, if you feel the convenience of a channel strip is desirable, there are plenty of options. Just google "channel strips".

One of the benefits I've noticed is that Melodyne syncs better with Cakewalk, e.g. their respective cursors are better able to match up to one another. Under version 4, I'd often have to switch focus back to Cakewalk before stopping and starting playback to avoid having Melodyne show a different part of the track than the DAW. I don't have to do that anymore. It's a small thing, but much appreciated. This guy pushed me over the edge...warning: don't watch these videos if you're absolutely determined to wait until the upgrade is $79 come Christmas.

For me, the volume-normalizing tool alone justified the cost. Haven't tried the de-esser yet.

I'm sure she's too young for this to be right, but I could swear she was my college Geology prof. It's the reason I gave up my childhood dream of being a geologist. Well, that and the realization that professional geologists don't spend their days just walking around looking for cool-looking rocks to take home. Many musicians do that, though.

Mystery solved. I had a look at the source, and it reads... while (strcmp(username, "Paulo") == 0; So it really is just you, man. Sorry.

You have a luthier? I have a guy in the back room of a music store who also repads clarinets. Dude, casually mentioning your luthier is like casually mentioning your personal assistant, head gardener or therapist.

I have never criticized the quality of Waves plugins. They are among the best there are. RBass remains a personal favorite. It's just their unhealthy obsession with copy protection that makes the brand undesirable. Their LA2A is indeed quite good, but there are many LA2A clone alternatives that are equally good, including Cakewalk's own CA2A. Once upon a time, Waves offered products that were truly unique and available nowhere else. Fortunately for consumers, that is no longer the case. Name any Waves product and I can suggest a comparable alternative from a vendor that won't treat you like a criminal.

I've had to recover Waves licenses twice. Although aggravating, it really wasn't a big deal. Still, given that most of Waves' competitors will never hassle you like that, why on earth would you put up with any aggravation at all?

I don't remember it being a long download. It was 1.3MB. But I only downloaded to my PC; I have not used the Android version.