Jump to content

slartabartfast

Members
  • Content Count

    96
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

49 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Uninstalling just takes a few minutes, and does not leave scars on your computer. More to the point, the time it takes to figure out how to use new software is the major cost of anything new. If you spend a couple of dozen hours figuring out that the software is not really going to be useful, that is time you will never be able to buy back at any price.
  2. I sprung for Waveform 8 Basic for $26.70 a couple of years ago. I really have had almost no use for it--so free might be a reasonable price for an upgrade--but not if this is an even more basic version than Basic. In what ways is this "free" version crippled? In fairness if you are a loop style composer this might be something for you. PS was anyone actually paying $386.00 for Waveform 10 Basic?
  3. The first thing I would try when one program installation seems to break another program is to reinstall the broken program. If there is a "repair" option under "Apps & Features" under the application try that first--but that is uncommon. If a re-install fails check to see if you have everything you need to do a complete new installation and then un-install the broken program and try again. Pay attention to the locations where your installation is writing files. Often enough the problem is that a program overwrites an existing file with one that is incompatible with the older program.
  4. Back in the early days of the Gibson>Bandlab conversion there was some discussion of what would become of the other Cakewalk (the company) products. I stumbled on this recently: https://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audio/xchange-producer-collection-with-presonus-cakewalk-ik-multimedia-image-line-loop-loft-ohm-force-and-sonnox Apparently CA-2A T-Type Leveling Amplifier has turned up in a discounted bundle. Maybe we will see the rest on one of those free free promotional DVD's from the music mags eventually.
  5. This $4.95 deal is back--or maybe it never went away and I am just getting the email. It sounds like a no-brainer price for a big pile of weird sounds, but some of the videos they show keep flashing a red banner that says "this effect requires GPU acceleration," which gives me some pause. Also I cannot find a manual on their site. Has anone actually used this thing? ps the version on sale is 1.2 so maybe the original sale was for 1.1 and this is an intro price for the new version
  6. I am afraid you missed my point. I am not saying that singers who employ a wide range of volumes in their performance are ignoramuses (ignorami?) or somehow doing something illegal--quite the contrary. My own personal taste in music is to have something when you are done that you cannot listen to in a moving car because the softest stuff falls below the wind and traffic noise threshold without the loudest stuff damaging your hearing--the kind of product turned out by every orchestra or serious non-pop singer in the history of music since the stone age. What I am saying is ignorant is to expect a real dynamic range to be reflected in a final recording that smashes the variance into a band of a few dB. If you want that kind of flattened volume range, then as a singer you should learn to produce it rather than depend on some feat of technology to achieve it from the original performance, and if you want to savor the beauty and expressiveness available in a wide dynamic range, then you need to use technology to capture it without exceeding the capacity of the technology. Look music-on-the-go and dodging-beer-bottle-venues have been major drivers of the loudness wars, and we are used to hearing stuff that is so compressed that it no longer qualifies as high fidelity. In fact radio stations for years have routinely compressed already squashed recordings and many streaming services and MP3 players routinely do the same. The days when people valued going to a sit down venue where alcohol was available only during intermissions and listening to a decent stereo in the dark filling the silence of their homes are probably long gone. Singers of pop music have in fact learned technique that makes that narrow-range product easy for engineers to produce. If the singer wants to make that flat-volume product, and still manages to clip or overload the equipment without falling below the noise floor he qualifies as out of control. Given the capability of decent equipment and the dynamic range of digital representation he also has a voice that is capable of more volume than a normal human. If he values the exploration of the range of loudness available to the human voice I applaud him. In any case, if you want to have the option to squash your performance in the box while maintaining the ability to let it stretch, then capturing the performance by recording less hot is the better way. You should realize that clipping in the digital realm is dependent on the total power at all frequencies (including those too low and high to hear), and that mixing all your tracks together is basically the process of addition. Perhaps the most effective way to avoid clipping in the final mix while getting something that is reasonably "loud" for today's listeners is to use is to use equalization in the box to filter out power at frequencies that are less important or are already occupied by other instruments so that they are not distinctly audible in the mixed track. That process subtracts dB from the final mix without requiring that loud become soft at least subjectively to the listener. You can then raise the volume of the entire mix without exceeding the clipping point. But early compression removes all the frequencies more or less indiscriminately and limits your options for that important technique in mixing.
  7. You ha Marled, bingo! That is what I am battling with So you need to ask yourself why is a singer using a wide range of dynamics. If he is just an out of control ignoramus who expects an interventionist engineer to cobble together a "normalized" gain envelope on the digital track, then compression may save you some work. But what if he intends to go from a whisper to a scream in the same song as a matter of style or musical expression. Compression anywhere is going to thwart that intent by narrowing the dynamic range of the recording more than the performance that is its source. To put it in perspective, the digital representation of audio on a 16 bit CD is capable of representing a dynamic range of 96 dB--that is roughly the range in dBspl from a whisper at six feet in a quiet room to the threshold of pain. The usual loudness range for singers is about 30-80 dB with a smash the glass opera singer maybe getting to 100. Presumably your singers are not singing so loudly without amplification that they are hurting themselves or those near them as they perform, so there should be more than enough dynamic range in the digital realm. You might have a problem if your microphones etc. are not sensitive enough to deal with the quietest parts when the loudest parts are quiet enough to avoid clipping. If the singer (or his engineer) expects the volume in his headphone feed to be normalized regardless of the loudness at his mouth hole, then it might be better to put a compressor on an analog circuit from mic to headphone and record the full dynamic range, at a lower volume for later tweaking.
  8. Just to be clear, the fact that you cannot use a software limiter on your input to avoid clipping is not a Cakewalk limitation--it derives from the mathematics of the process, and applies to all software. Software effects work only on digital data--stuff that is not audio at all but numbers that represent it in the computer. So if you send a signal from your microphone/preamp to the audio to digital (D/A) converter in your audio interface that produces a number bigger than the maximum bit depth your software uses to represent sound that is going to cause clipping (lost data) that is irretrievable in the box. Putting a limiter on the digital data stream after the clipping has occurred at the A/D will not bring the lost data back. A hardware limiter is what is needed if you want to avoid clipping on input, since it will act on the analog/electrical signal prior to it reaching the A/D. Technically you will also lose data using any kind of limiter at any point. The power/volume of the original signal is reduced and that is a characteristic of the original sound that the digital representation will not correctly encode--but reducing the analog power low enough to avoid digital overs at the A/D will prevent the nasty artifacts that digital overs produce. As others have noted the best practice is to record at lower input gain (record less "hot") and use a bit depth representation that gives you some extra zero bits at the top. You can then bring up the power of the digital data representation with software overall, or limit the variation between the softest and loudest parts of the recording using a software compressor/limiter.
  9. 76 USD is a really low price point for any contemporary audio interface with MIDI connections. Your best bet is to find a used interface at that price--even that is likely to be a stretch. The other option is to buy and pair a couple of the really cheapo audio and MIDI interfaces as separate units. If you have a firewire interface that you are not going to use, it is likely better than anything you can buy for your budget, and your best plan might be to find someone who will buy that or take it in trade to get you up to a reasonable budget. I would definitely not advise you to buy something that can be had for that cheap--try to see if you can get a job raking leaves for a few days and get into the $250 US or better range which will give you a bunch of quite usable USB connected units.
  10. It sounds as if you are really having a problem composing, harmonizing or orchestrating rather than a MIDI problem. MIDI is just another way to record or notate music and if you already know how to edit MIDI, then you have everything you need to create a symphony from scratch if that is your goal. If you know the notes you want a MIDI controlled sound source to play, the simplest method for getting there is to use some kind of MIDI controller. If you lack the instrumental chops to play a controller in real time, then step record, enter notes in a piano roll editor, play on your instrument of choice or try to use pitch to MIDI conversion algorithms etc. You can even enter notes in an event list editor if you can convert the notes in your mind to note numbers, velocity values and duration. If you do not know the notes you want to play, then MIDI is not an answer to anything. Band in a Box and other algorithmic composition/harmonization tools may use MIDI inputs and outputs but they are not MIDI--they are computer assisted composition tools. I am not saying you should not use them, but by their nature they are designed to give you a solution to a problem or at best a choice of solutions that may or may not be what you want.
  11. I remain confused about Seaweed's upgrade policy. It looks to me like you need to buy each new upgrade and that it will install only if you have an earlier (the most recent?) version installed. Can you explain how this works?
  12. The statement is as opaque a collection of inane business jargon as I have read in a long time. Perhaps they are heading toward online subscriptions but if that is what "the development of a new, unified and fully integrated platform on which the company's entire portfolio of products and services will be available next year," means the Delphic oracle could have said it with more clarity. Not that they do not plan to do that--everyone else apparently does. Could just as well mean they are developing a DAW or have invented a direct link to the temporal lobe bypassing the ears entirely.
  13. So it looks like you are replacing a PCI card with 4 channel duplex (using SPDIF and balanced pair of I/O) with 24/96 and MIDI in/out. If you need all that for under 500.00 you can probably find several USB connected solutions. You can come pretty close with a Focusrite Scarlett 6i6 for about half of your budget.
  14. Is there a manual or how-to somewhere for this?
×
×
  • Create New...