Terry Kelley

On 12/1/2024 at 10:24 AM, Wookiee said:

Sorry a what a "combinatorial proliferation" but that is kind of the point of being able to have multiple arrangements. How many different arrangements do you think you are going to need? 

Some arrangements have all sections some don't, seems you want to complicate something that works fine as is. Do you know the acronym KISS. 

If you need more than 5 or 6 I suggest you start a new tune, obviously you didn't have idea of what you wanted when you started.

You write sections, you then try different arrangements of sections, until you get one you like.

Moved  as it is more a feature request.

This is a bit uncalled for Wookie.

If I understand his request he wants to temporarily disable a section, not create a whole new arrangement. I wouldn’t mind this either. 

I suspect Bille Eilish is another. Her impromptu a capellas are pretty freaking tight.

On 11/5/2024 at 8:41 AM, craigb said:

While considering anomalous electroweak sphaleron transition baryogenesis over the weekend, I was thinking one could implement a generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model by including unicellular diazotrophic cyanbacteria group A into a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.  What do you guys think?  Would this be a plausible approach?

That with diatonic plywood.

Are they leaving chem-trails? Asking for a friend.

55 minutes ago, Notes_Norton said:

Yes, it was his name in the Cyrillic alphabet, but translated by AI

BTW, My secret identity is “Typoman - writing all wrongs”

 

 

Notes ♫

I just read mine and it sounds like  I never learned English. Fixed hopefully.

Like a vintage “90s” Les Paul. 

2 hours ago, Mr No Name said:

I'll see if 3 more suggestions come in, the cat and the acid might not make it through.

The issue is the task order. Eat the acid, wait 90 minutes then pick the cat. Results are guaranteed.

It's been almost a week and no one has posted about cheap tone wood.

14 hours ago, OutrageProductions said:

I've had clients require 5.1 since 1996, and a few that asked for 7.1 since 2017 (which I can do in house), but one editor asked for 7.1.4 Atmos in '23, so when I went up to Vancouver to the film mix stage, turns out that, since all I did was the music beds, 7.1 was more than sufficient. Generally (not always tho) the MD wants the music bed to be down close to the ground, and only the foley and EFX are flown in elevation.

However, a colleague of mine has been doing quite a bit of 7.1.4 and larger jazz projects (like for the Las Vegas Sphere) and they are 'interesting' to say the least.

I've done a far amount of quadraphonic mixing lately or 5.1 without a center channel.

10 minutes ago, craigb said:

I prefer 396 degree music!  It's 10% better!  😁

I'm still laughing!

It's important after any music training to doodle. Don't try and apply theory, just doodle. Make stuff up. Wander around the keyboard. Hum along.  I think that helps keep the creativity flowing and you can use the theory to solve problems, not write a song.

I have a habit of boxing myself into a corner with chord and key changes and what little theory I know helps me get my ***** out and back to the main theme.

As mentioned above, someone I know really well is top notch in theory and sight reading. But playing to even a metronome is nearly impossible because that unnamed person wants to constantly stop and replay any bad notes.

If you do have a chance to play with others, take it. That goes a long way.

Did Cakewalk ever fix the speaker muting is surround? I had to switch to another DAW for my  surround work. I guess I could check.  But with AI I won’t have too!

They

aren't

going

to

change

their

mind.

Dunno. I would assume AI can create 5.1, 7.1, googleplex.1 surround or Ambisonic or quadraphonic or whatever-sonic. No reason it can't. Is it necessary to appreciate it's output? I don't necessarily think so.

It all sounds so technical.

Maybe so. But it doesn’t appear they want to test our theories! 😀 I personally think too many people have moved on but only Bandlab knows for sure. Our pitching and bitching hasn’t moved them one inch. And Wookie pretty much confirmed it. 

Whatsamatta McFly? Chicken? ;)

We could do it by  referencing only their costs!

12 hours ago, Sock Monkey said:

...
Cakewalk is one of the few Daw’s with actual midi tracks. Most only have instrument tracks.

Really?

I completely understand the reservations about getting heavily involved in software that will stop working if the company goes #!# up or sheds the product due to losses. Like it's never happened before. We will just have to see if Bandlab can avoid the same pitfalls.

On the other hand, rental is probably the only viable future for Cakewalk/Sonar. So it's best to let it wander off.

I thought Noel said older versions of CbB wouldn’t validate. Maybe you are still inside the 6 month window. I believe the last version dropped to 30 days.

Agreed. Any reverb or chorus will be dependent on the sound module being able to do it. The command to add reverb or chorus can be in MIDI but not the actual reverb or chorusing. 

It’s not the Bakers. It’s Bandlab. 

I've been encouraging people to post Sonar feature request in Feedback Loop, but this is a good question. I'll stop if it's appropriate.

Might have been $60 but specifically mentioning a competing DAW can get a post deleted or a good chewing out.

It's the hint some aren't willing to take.