Jakub O

Thanks for chiming in Noel!

I need separate WAV files when collaborating with people who doesn't use Cakewalk, when I need to import the takes in different software, and also for archival purposes.

This looks like nice workaround, many thanks Glenn!

The only caveat is that it gets really tedious when you have huge project with hundreds of takes.

Is there any way to bounce all the takes at once, without having to click on each take and bounce it one by one?

Is there any way to create new file for each take, without manually exporting them one by one?

14 hours ago, Kev said:

You will probably see an improvement in the image quality with a Matrox card.

On the other hand 32MB might be a bit too low. At one stage when I was running Sonar X3 I had a 4-screen setup with 128MB each on two screens and 64MB each on the other two. There was a noticeable different in performance. The latter two were more sluggish.

This is exactly what I needed to know. Will buy nice GPU for my system. Thank you, Kev!

I definitely don't want the CPU to render too much graphics, even if the actual performance hit would be very little. That's very important information, thank you, mettelus!

msmcleod: I'm just running Cakewalk on super low-end laptop with onboard Intel graphics and it runs great! :-) but I think Intel HD graphic cards have 128MB of memory and much faster clock speed?

bitman: That was what I was thinking too. I can buy new graphics card, but I'm not sure if it would be actually better for DAW computer. On the other hand, I'm affraid that this card might be so slow that it will cause latency / lags / stutter when running Cakewalk.

In the System Requirements for Cakewalk, there is no mention of graphics card. Would the latest Cakewalk run smoothly on system with 32MB graphics card (Matrox G200)?

It is new, high end machine with plenty of CPU power, just the graphics is not that good.

Any help would be greatly appreciated 🙂