Jump to content

Esther Brulard

Members
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Esther Brulard

  1. Oh thank you all for your answers. I have work a little more this song. Several of you have told me about the voice level, so i put it down a bit. And I have also put a bit more forward the kick, and add some extra low mid to the piano. I have lower the reverb from time to time. Here is the v2, sounds it better for you? :

     

    • Like 3
  2. Hello! This is a song almost mixed. I have to cleen up the voice tracks ("ssss", "plop", and so on) and to fix some reverb effects (e.g 0:49). What's your opinion? Vocals more loud or quiet? It seems to be a little too much "in the face" when switching to a mono listening.

     

    • Like 2
  3. @DeeringAmps thank you for your appreciation, and no, it's not midi files! But I don't know the name of the guitarist, it's a friend of the singer. The Cd version is the same that the one which is above on the top. I've renamed it to emphasize the difference with the "radio" version.

    • Like 1
  4. I've made a less compressed radio master from this CD version, what do you think of the rendering (see first comment)? I've also tried both versions with the algorythm of youtube, and I think the less compressed sounds better because of loudness penalty whereas on soundcloud the sound of the CD version seems more appealing to me , it's a typical case of loudness penalty on youtube, I've post it here on comments for those who are curious and to have your opinion.

     

  5. I'm curious to hear it with a vocal. But as the work is "in progress" it's probably not the time for it. I'm agreed with Guerilla Genus, there is a lot of idea that can find their place here, since the base is inspiring. Good work, I'd be happy to listen the extra work you will make on this.

  6. Well done. The final synth has made me rightly think of a bee that is foraging. Nice stereo, and vocals sounds good. Sometimes some of the chorus start a word a little before or after your leader voice, but it's a detail. At 3:14 the succession of a telephone lead, and after a simple vocal, and after the doubler is a perfect idea. The chorist at 4:27 brings a wonderful power to this part of the song. Good mix, great work.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...