Jump to content

이우영

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 이우영

  1. On 5/2/2021 at 1:35 AM, David Baay said:

    A Fermata is usually a pause of all instruments, and only requires a single, lower  tempo to the achieve the desired pause. Any changes to individual notes within that pause can and should be done with duration. Excessively dense tempo changes can cause problems with FX processing, and other playback anomalies.

    Give me any sample project and I can reduce the tempo map to have no more than one, fixed tempo per note start that will be indistinguishable on playback from the one with curves and nodes between note starts.

    I generally perform tempo variations in real time rather than drawing them, but I did enough editing in the old tempo view to know that it was quite awkward because you couldn't drag or 'sculpt' existing tempo changes; you either had to re-draw them completely, or painstakingly click above or below a tempo with snap enabled at the correct resolution to prevent inserting a new one, or manually edit values in the list. The new envelope implementation should be much more user-friendly for this purpose once you get used to it.

    "A Fermata is usually a pause of all instruments, and only requires a single, lower  tempo to the achieve the desired pause."

    This sentence is a very interesting view. Perhaps it is the first absurd argument made in musicology.

    The term 'fermata' is merely a slow instruction, and the slow control is assumed to be in the free will of the performer.
    Also, if the instrument is superimposed, a fermata in one place requires breathing for each instrument.

    So it's a very narrow-minded idea to need only one low tempo.
    In addition to the fermata, each instrument requires proper breathing, either when expressing a rubato or when moving from one frame to the next.

    Curves and straight lines, or just one low tempo, are never enough to express this.

    I understand that too dense speed changes put a load on FX processing. If there's a lot of data, there needs to be a process about it. 
    But what I pointed out is why the features and information of the previous version disappeared after the update.

    It is a fatal problem that the previous project is loaded and not accurately reproduced to its old condition. 
    I have pointed out that it is a separate issue from re-drawing or re-conditioning tempo information, and by no means am I going to have a 'unique' debate on the speed of music like Fermata.

  2. 14 hours ago, David Baay said:

    As I have posted many times, it is not musically necessary to have tempo changes in between notes.  Only one, fixed tempo (i.e. a flat line) is needed to perfectly determine the time between the start of one note, and the start of the next, and the type of music has no bearing on this. Classical music is no more complex or sophisticated than any other type of music in this respect.

    There are a lot of situations where you have to freely increase one note, including Fermata. Whether it's classical music or any music, free tempo control is a feature that was clearly allowed in previous versions, so I questioned the phenomenon of being lost as the function and information were updated. Besides straight and curved information, I definitely need a function that can be adjusted in more detail. The function of the old 'tempo view' was excellent when one note was controlled by access to another media and wanted to be increased as much as desired.

  3. to msmcleod.

    Oh, thank you so much. I never dreamed of this method. I opened the old project, and the tempo details were intact. But can't we find the old 'tempo view' anymore? Then I'm a little disappointed.

    Thank you very much for your reply. ^^

    zxcz213.png

  4. In this update, 'tempo view' disappeared and 'tempo track' was newly introduced, which is completely uncomfortable for me and randomly destroyed the tempo details. There are only straight lines and curves, because of the classical music work, the tempo work is completely detailed, and I brought up the old work file, but the program itself seems to have changed to straight lines and curves... This is a serious problem, has the previous version of the tempo view completely disappeared? ... The biggest problem is that the previous work tempo information is randomly curved in a straight line, so if you play it, it's fatal to not sync. The freedom of tempo control is quite limited, and the audio tempo control aspect seems to be quite progressive, but the old project should at least be preserved properly.

×
×
  • Create New...