IK TONEX MAX Update from 1.9.2 to 1.9.3 available

[Larry Shelby]

Run the IKPM to update

What’s new in version 1.9.3:

Added support for TONEX ONE Brown Sound Limited Edition.

TONEX Pedal firmware 1.6.15

TONEX ONE firmware 1.3.15

General reliability improvements.

[Brian Walton]

I'm a huge TONEX fan but recently ran into a real annoyance.

I own multiple TONEX pedals, and let a friend who has a paid TONEX software tier borrow one of my pedals, I ASSUMED that the pedal would be recognized by his software and would allow him to run the editor on it to adjust it to his taste.  Nope, pedal not recognized as the serial is tied to my account.

Pretty absurd.  The pedal comes with the same tier of software he has.  

[IK Multimedia]

On 7/30/2025 at 11:57 AM, Brian Walton said:

I'm a huge TONEX fan but recently ran into a real annoyance.

I own multiple TONEX pedals, and let a friend who has a paid TONEX software tier borrow one of my pedals, I ASSUMED that the pedal would be recognized by his software and would allow him to run the editor on it to adjust it to his taste.  Nope, pedal not recognized as the serial is tied to my account.

Pretty absurd.  The pedal comes with the same tier of software he has.  

Something is going on there.  I have connected countless TONEX pedals that are not registered to my account and they work perfectly inside TONEX Editor without a hitch.  I would reach out to IK Support so they can figure out what is happening there.  I verified that it should work as you expected via our Testing Manager who has run this scenario multiple times in a much "cleaner" (more scientific/structured) environment than mine, too.

[Brian Walton]

1 hour ago, IK Multimedia said:

Something is going on there.  I have connected countless TONEX pedals that are not registered to my account and they work perfectly inside TONEX Editor without a hitch.  I would reach out to IK Support so they can figure out what is happening there.  I verified that it should work as you expected via our Testing Manager who has run this scenario multiple times in a much "cleaner" (more scientific/structured) environment than mine, too.

Good to know.

Will reach out.