Jump to content

Studio One is about to get the Shaft


Larry Shelby

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Bapu said:

 

And so we may have come full circle to the title of the OP? 

 

 

I'll get me coat.

No, that is incorrect.

My point is that IF PreSonus-- or any other software developer-- cannot continue to grow market share, they're likely not going to have a bright future as a DAW software developer. The premise of this thread was a knee jerk misinterpretation of an interview with the CEO not based in what the CEO said but founded in misunderstanding and unfounded assumptions. Abacab stating "that could be the bottom line" is affirming the statement I made that PreSonus needs to keep growing its customer base if it's going to remain in the DAW software market and that means it must pursue younger DAW users and it's critical to get the entry level products right. That, of course,  is a very different point than the original post. 

 

Edited by Peter Woods
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2022 at 1:53 PM, TW5011 said:

Sharing music with friends is part of what music is all about, right?  It's more "social" than just uploading it to SoundCloud with no promotion.  So if they can make that easy to do, that would be a big plus.

I would agree with that certainly and the other comments you made before it. I guess there are more levels to the spectrum. Not everyone will see that the same way. I believe most in this crowd and probably most any other crowd of serious DAW users will not see it the same. I always wanted to be both a better musician AND a better sound engineer, yet I have met plenty who had almost zero interest in the technical end. That's a spectrum too- The dedicated musicians and those with pipe dreams who can't play a chord.

I have never attempted to really promote myself because it made music unfun for me.:) You will notice I don't care if my site is linked here or not. Some of it is ok and some of it I should have probably deleted a long time ago. The profits from online music are so dismal it isn't worth my effort to put anything out. I share stuff sometimes.

Back maybe 5 years ago Soundcloud was a real community and musicians on it were actively sharing others tracks and taking the time to comment, then there was some kind of a shift there in ownership or something and whatever happened seems to have killed most of it. TBH I felt like a ***** liking some of the material there because I honestly didn't like it, but sometimes felt the need to comment on someone who had commented on my material. I eventually realized I just didn't have the time to listen to thousands of tracks and make objective comments or shares, so I sorta dropped out of that. I also understood it went both ways, with maybe some of my listeners gagging when they listened to my tracks.I just stopped most of it because after all, I didn't go there to listen to others tracks, I went there to post my tracks. I know that might sound self centered. I like a lot of it, but I just can't keep that ball rolling. There are people at home all day and THIS IS ALL THEY DO...listen to tracks and comment in return for the same (hopefully).Many of these people actually have pretty crappy music, but they made a lot of "friends" on SC. 

21 hours ago, Peter Woods said:

My point is that IF PreSonus-- or any other software developer-- cannot continue to grow market share, they're likely not going to have a bright future as a DAW software developer. The premise of this thread was a knee jerk misinterpretation of an interview with the CEO not based in what the CEO said but founded in misunderstanding and unfounded assumptions. Abacab stating "that could be the bottom line" is affirming the statement I made that PreSonus needs to keep growing its customer base if it's going to remain in the DAW software market and that means it must pursue younger DAW users and it's critical to get the entry level products right. That, of course,  is a very different point than the original post. 

I understood the vain nature of the title at the very beginning after the first few posts. I felt like maybe Larry put it up more as something fun to read and talk about....and we all might remember the past time the owner of a guitar company decided to make some "changes" with Cakewalk. *ahem*. That was an interesting ride for those who had invested in the Cakewalk program paying anywhere from 299-499.00 for it.

So maybe some can see a little apprehension in the title for those who are now vested in Studio One. It doesn't really bother me much either way.

I'll bet you a hamburger this is mostly smoke, but if some of it isn't, then I would be so very surprised if anything EVER happens to the flagship core program. It would be a kind of corporate suicide. 

Entry level can be any number of things. I mean, I can buy plastic screwdrivers and fake power saws. Yes I am being slightly sarcastic here to make my point.An entry level product can either make a company look better or worse.

I see the bandlab app as an entry level product that seems to work ok for many. It has a decent amount of functionality, but I would NEVER expect it to replace Cakewalk and probably one reason why Cakewalk was acquired.

What makes me wonder -why should the CEO even mention this at all unless it's hype, or maybe a way to gauge interest ahead of time? And when was the last time is was news when a 'lite' version comes out? " Yep here's the new Ford, minus air conditioning and the passenger seat."

So,,,,,it's smoke, either that of he was smoking something.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...