FJ Lamela

I have downloaded your project and tested it. I cannot reproduce the bug. Automation works correctly in the VST3 version of serum. Regards.

Thanks. I've looked at all the local help and the pdf document. Either I'm really dumb or I can't see anything related to creating new patterns.

Greetings. While I have no complaints about the operation of the arpeggiator (midi), there is something I don't quite understand. How is it possible that I can't find a way to create new patterns and add them to the existing ones? It would be logical that from the step sequencer it could be exported as a pattern for the arpeggiator, or failing that add some option to be able to add new content. If you are forced to use only the default patterns of the internal arpeggiator and to create new ones you are forced to use an external arpeggiator (blue arp for example) then the included arpeggiator would not make much sense. Is my deduction correct or am I wrong and is there a way without the need for third party software to add new patterns to the existing ones? Thanks and sorry for my english.

It's a shame can't change it, thank you!

I mean slope of spectrum view, no for band. Sorry for my english.

Greetings. Is there any way to change the spectrum view slope in the equalizer? Currently it is 0 but most of us work in 3db/oct and more commonly in 4.5 db/oct. Commercial equalizers have the ability to modify this slope and I would like to know if there is any way to modify it in sonar via aud.ini or similar. Thanks.

Thanks for the tip, but in my opinion its interface and workflow are a bit outdated. I think that by bringing ideas that are already implemented in other DAWs, CakewalkSonar can be competitive among other DAWs. Staying stuck in 10-year-old technology and plug-ins without improving the workflow is nonsense in these competitive times. I believe that a picture is worth a thousand words.

Well, it's a shame because other companies like Steinberg and Presonus have already adopted the idea.

The step sequencer was a great feature that many developers have copied for other DAWs. I have no complaints about how it works... But I've always missed the fact that you can't load samples and make it work as a drum machine. I think that feature would give the step sequencer a fresh and functional look, confirming its genius since its development. Thanks.

Thanks a lot

Greetings. I am currently using a 10-year-old workstation with an i7 4790k and 32GB of DDR3 RAM. I have never overlocked the processor so I don't know if buying the K version was a mistake. The time has come to upgrade this PC, because after ten years of use WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS, it is starting to show its weakness when faced with the different power requirements in the new software that is coming out on the market. Due to the number of problems that Intel is presenting with the 13900 and 14900, I am considering changing to Ryzen. Looking at comparisons, it seems that Ryzen 7 9700 is on par with the latest Intel in terms of power and processing capacity. But since I have never used AMD, I would like to know if any of you use it and what your experience has been. I would also like to know in your opinion if Intel is better for audio even with the problems that it presents. Thanks.

A host of workflow improvements, improved cpu utilization all running smoothly smooth as silk. The oversampling and sidechain options (among others) are a great improvement.

You have a great sense of humor, but beyond the joke, pop up screen are a nuisance

As a professional user of Cakewalk in its beginnings until Sonar and in this last stage with Bandlab, I do not understand this suicidal step (in my opinion) of the program developers. As a veteran user of a software that I have also publicly supported unconditionally, I think that giving us a pop up screen with which we have to wait 20 seconds to start working is not the best way to invite us to continue with your next paid software update that is announced in that notification. I really see it as an insult to all of us who have relied on this software over the years. I would like to be understood, I have always admired the efficiency, simplicity and robustness with which I have worked with Cakewalk/sonar/Bandlab as well as with their innovations that have later been incorporated into other competing DAWs. But the reality in 2024 is very different, there are many DAWs that offer many innovations and possibilities in the workflow, dsp, etc... that far exceed what this software and its next paid update offer so far. . Cakewalk has not had many users in my opinion, but it has had LOYAL USERS. Make loyal users go through: 1.- Impossibility of being registered offline. 2.- Need to authorize online registration from time to time. 3.- Show a pop up screen and wait 20 seconds until you can start working. All this for being loyal to a software that also stops being updated and that will soon become obsolete (due to how quickly the world of software in general and the musical world in particular is progressing), in my opinion, It does not give us the place that belongs to us I hope and wish that the software team will reconsider (just as the waves audio team did at the time) in the face of this wrong path, which will only make many users abandon a software that may have a great future, but a market strategy wrong (in my opinion). Thank you for reading, I hope I haven't offended anyone and please forgive my English.

Thanks