Jump to content

Peter Hudson

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Thanks again, I was only planning on getting the X-Touch and one extender for the moment as most of my current projects rarely go above 16 tracks.
  2. Thank you for your comprehensive answer as always. Before I bite the bullet and buy the Behringer X-Touch can the rotary encoders be made to control the Pro Channel EQ? I got this working fine on the US-2400 using ACT learn and our son modified the MackieControl.ini for me.
  3. Thanks again for your very comprehensive reply. I think it is time for me to consider replacing the US-2400 and I will check out the options you have suggested.
  4. Thanks I will give that a try.
  5. Hmmm I may have to revert to my old setup then. Many thanks for your response.
  6. Many thanks for your response, unfortunately it isn't the model 2400 mixer that I have it is the Tascam US-2400 Control Surface which is no longer supported by Tascam.
  7. Peter Hudson

    Tascam US-2400

    I have had the US-2400 working perfectly on a 2 year old version of Cakewalk by Bandlab and Windows 8.1. I even had the rotaries controlling the ProChannel EQ thanks to help from this forum and our son, who is a software engineer. I have now upgraded to Windows 11 and the latest free version of Cakewalk and the US-2400 is not responding correctly even though I have it set up as before. The faders appear to do random movements and the Pan, Aux and Channel buttons can not decide which is which. Is this a known issue and is there a fix?
  8. Peter Hudson

    Tascam US-2400

    Can the US-2400 be made to control plug-ins in the Pro Channel, particularly the EQ?
×
×
  • Create New...