Jump to content

Are You a Fan of Blue Cat Audio?


bitflipper

Recommended Posts

I am. Their stuff is often pricier than the competition, but I really like the clean UIs and low CPU burden. 

But this post isn't a fanboy love letter to Blue Cat, but rather a call for comments from those who use any or all of the following plugins:

  • Oscilloscope Multi
  • FreqAnalyst Multi (not FreqAnalyst Pro)
  • StereoScope Multi

I know some of you picked these up when they went on sale back in June. I'd like to hear your opinions: what you like, what you don't like, how you use them, and whether they've proven valuable to you. Did you find them confusing or intuitive? Did you switch from a competitor, or perhaps abandoned them in favor of another competitor? Maybe you find these types of tools useless or more trouble than they're worth, or are content with CbB's built-in analysis tools.

This is research in preparation for a review in next month's SoundBytes Magazine. Thanks in advance for your observations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A guy goes in to see a proctologist complaining about discomfort.  After the guy bends over, the doctor examines him and proceeds to pull out a long stem rose!  "Who did this to you??!" inquires the doc, "I don't know," replies the guy, "is there a card?"  😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep forgetting that I have that one. It's good (and free!), although I usually reach for D16 Group's Syntorus when I need a chorus. Very flexible and currently on sale, too, for 25 EUR. Sale ends today, btw.

Speaking of freebies, I also use the free BC Gain plugin a lot. Pretty much every vocal track. It's part of the free Gain Suite.

But it's the metering and analysis tools that I've been concentrating on lately. The value of multi-channel spectrum analyzers is obvious, but I'm struggling to come up with a compelling reason for the stereoscope tool. It's fun to look at, but I'm not sure it'll actually help me mix better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, craigb said:

A guy goes in to see a proctologist complaining about discomfort.  After the guy bends over, the doctor examines him and proceeds to pull out a long stem rose!  "Who did this to you??!" inquires the doc, "I don't know," replies the guy, "is there a card?"  😁

Another side splitting chuckle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BF: it's good to see you back here.  I hope you're well.

I have the FreqAnalyst Multi.  I used it more when I first got it (now it's been supplanted by Izotope Neoutron EQ).  I thought graphically it was beautiful, but I did find it a tad bit confusing.  Not overwhlemingly so, but just enough to frustrate me a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.  Yes, I suppose FreqAnalyst Multi is slightly less intuitive than, say, SPAN+ or MMultiAnalyzer. But more confusing than Neutron?

pwalpwal, the difference is the three tools I'm currently evaluating are all multi-channel. The StereoScope tool, for example, shows you panning information for as many individual tracks as you want to look at at once. It's a very different view than, say, Insight's stereo meters, which can be deceiving. Let's say you have a project consisting of mostly wide stereo tracks - standard goniometers would indicate a nice stereo spread, even if the full mix actually lacked panoramic definition to your ears. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...