locrian Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 (edited) Info: https://bedroomproducersblog.com/2023/03/14/neural-amp-modeler/ Download: https://github.com/sdatkinson/NeuralAmpModelerPlugin/releases Edited March 14, 2023 by locrian 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jude77 Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 There are quite a few models on their facebook group: Neural Amp Modeler (NAM) Discussion 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALC Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 This is similar to TONEX, except the captures are amp only—you’ll need to load an IR (but it’s integrated in the plugin). It compares very favorably in terms of accuracy in YouTube comparisons. Currently, only 48 kHz sampling rate is supported. Such a great free option. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esteban Villanova Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 It uses more than 10 times the CPU than TONEX 1 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragi Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 3 minutes ago, Esteban Villanova said: It uses more than 10 times the CPU than TONEX This could be causing the price....😏 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marlowg01 Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 It sounds fantastic though, so definitely worth adding it to your toolbox IMO. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumbquestions Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 (edited) Dumb question, but I know nothing about github so the coding/text everywhere throws me off. To download do i just click either the single .exe or .dmg file, and do I need my own IR’s, or do they come included? Edited March 16, 2023 by dumbquestions 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User 905133 Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, dumbquestions said: Dumb question, but I know nothing about github so the coding/text everywhere throws me off. To download do i just click either the single .exe or .dmg file . . . . Not really dumb. Other github projects will have a section labelled "Installers" or something like that. I took a look at the one that says NeuralAmpModeler-v0.7.0-win.zip. It has an executable installer inside the zip file. I will probably not install it (no need for this plugin), so I am not sure if it comes with IRs. Note: the manual inside that zip file says "Dummy Manual." Edited March 16, 2023 by User 905133 To add a note about the documentation 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Call Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 On 3/14/2023 at 10:36 AM, ALC said: This is similar to TONEX, except the captures are amp only—you’ll need to load an IR (but it’s integrated in the plugin). It compares very favorably in terms of accuracy in YouTube comparisons. Currently, only 48 kHz sampling rate is supported. Such a great free option. Too bad, I only work with 96Khz and above... (not really, just 96Khz) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MusicMan Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 On 3/15/2023 at 3:09 AM, Esteban Villanova said: It uses more than 10 times the CPU than TONEX At least it's less than 10+ times smaller in disk space 😎 A few of the amp models I tried sounded really good. Amazing for free. O.7 release apparently improved CPU usage, so hopefully they keep optimising there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digital media services Posted April 19, 2023 Share Posted April 19, 2023 Hello everyone, I have created a few NAM models I would like to share. I will be adding more stuff in time. Here is the page where you can download them. https://digitalmediaassets.manysubdomainnames.com/nammodels.html 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno de Souza Lino Posted April 19, 2023 Share Posted April 19, 2023 On 3/16/2023 at 1:05 PM, Last Call said: Too bad, I only work with 96Khz and above... (not really, just 96Khz) Well, in that case, the plugin will have no added benefit to the audio quality and use 20 times more CPU! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esteban Villanova Posted April 19, 2023 Share Posted April 19, 2023 1 hour ago, Bruno de Souza Lino said: Well, in that case, the plugin will have no added benefit to the audio quality and use 20 times more CPU! It works exclusively at 48 khz, not 96 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Last Call Posted April 19, 2023 Share Posted April 19, 2023 2 hours ago, Bruno de Souza Lino said: Well, in that case, the plugin will have no added benefit to the audio quality and use 20 times more CPU! Probably, but since watching Paul Third youtube videos I can't use less than 96khz. You'd have to watch his videos to understand why (when recording at least with analog gear). Maybe a light version could be created for recording at 96 khz (I know, prob asking too much) and by light I mean somehow a version maybe even undersampling, lol, instead of oversampling, just to monitor ourselves while recording. Idk, I even myself would have to watch that Paul 3rd video again, lol (I think it's the one where he talks about audio interfaces and even the Prism Lyra or something like that colors your sound where cheaper audio interfaces do not) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno de Souza Lino Posted April 20, 2023 Share Posted April 20, 2023 (edited) 19 hours ago, Last Call said: Probably, but since watching Paul Third youtube videos I can't use less than 96khz. You'd have to watch his videos to understand why (when recording at least with analog gear). Maybe a light version could be created for recording at 96 khz (I know, prob asking too much) and by light I mean somehow a version maybe even undersampling, lol, instead of oversampling, just to monitor ourselves while recording. Idk, I even myself would have to watch that Paul 3rd video again, lol (I think it's the one where he talks about audio interfaces and even the Prism Lyra or something like that colors your sound where cheaper audio interfaces do not) Personally, all the differences Paul claims to hear in his video can only be measured 99% of the time. In the perfect linear world of digital audio, aliasing is a solved problem. When you introduce analog gear into the equation, you're opening a can of worms that could potentially cause you headaches, especially with old gear that was not developed with the thought of not introducing aliasing and IM products beyond the audible range. Edited April 20, 2023 by Bruno de Souza Lino 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now