Jump to content

$99 Mixcraft 9 Pro Studio, $49 Mixcraft 9 Recording Studio, until Sept. 26


daveiv

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Esteban Villanova said:

I wonder if version 10 will drop soon. They've been working on it for a long time.

From Acoustica Greg:

Quote

Update: it being August already, it's starting to look like Mixcraft 10 won't be ready until next year (2023).

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel they scored enough capital from their Cherry Audio products to invest in Mixcraft to make it a serious contender in the DAW world. It's been growing steadily since the beginning, but 10 should be a great leap forward.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no such thing as a  proper way to preview Midi Files in Mixcraft . I hardly consider it a time saver to have no way of auditioning small drum loop midi's .

Kenny

PS I talked to them years ago about this limitation on the old SONAR forum Apparently they thought it was better to Gaslight me than add midi preview .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a Mixcraft fan from way back, like v5. It was my main DAW before CbB, but when I got a look at Cakewalk's Console vs. the one in Mixcraft, I was gone. When I mixed in Mixcraft, I did it using the Track/Timeline view because the mixer was so lame.

It has some very convenient features that I miss in Cakewalk, but it also lacks many that now seem essential to me, like collapsible lanes. If you have multiple takes on a track and want to reclaim the screen real estate, the only way to do it is to put the track in a folder and then close the folder.

I can get things done faster with Mixcraft's workflow, but Cakewalk's features are so much greater. The way that folders=submixes in Mixcraft is brilliant. Drag all your guitar tracks to a folder, boom, instant submix.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Starship Krupa said:

I'm a Mixcraft fan from way back, like v5. It was my main DAW before CbB, but when I got a look at Cakewalk's Console vs. the one in Mixcraft, I was gone. When I mixed in Mixcraft, I did it using the Track/Timeline view because the mixer was so lame.

It has some very convenient features that I miss in Cakewalk, but it also lacks many that now seem essential to me, like collapsible lanes. If you have multiple takes on a track and want to reclaim the screen real estate, the only way to do it is to put the track in a folder and then close the folder.

I can get things done faster with Mixcraft's workflow, but Cakewalk's features are so much greater. The way that folders=submixes in Mixcraft is brilliant. Drag all your guitar tracks to a folder, boom, instant submix.

Mixcraft ---stems---> Harrison Mixbus flow would work for you?

Mixbus has a phenomenal mixer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Starship Krupa said:

I like Cakewalk's mixer better than Mixbus'. There are some features about Mixcraft's track view and comping I like, but Cakewalk has an edge due to better handling of clip grouping.

Fair. ProChannel is admirable.

I just can't seem to get into the MIDI workflow and piano roll in Cakewalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...