Jump to content

Bandlab or Cakewalk By Bandlab


DallasSteve

Recommended Posts

I have Cakewalk By Bandlab installed and I was about to start studying how to use it.  Then I see on the Bandlab home page that they are promoting Bandlab, a 100% Free online DAW.  Would I be wise to learn how to use it instead?  Does it do everything Cakewalk By Bandlab does?  Do they look and operate similarly?  I've used Cakewalk before but it's been a few years and I need a refresher and was planning to watch some tutorials.  I plan to create multi-tracked song demos using a Midi keyboard.  I've read that Cakewalk By Bandlab is not being updated; will they be updating the online Bandlab DAW?  Thanks.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, DallasSteve said:

I've read that Cakewalk By Bandlab is not being updated

Where?

 

Cakewalk by BandLab has been updated at least every other month since it was released,

There is a dedicated section of this forum containing its update annoucements https://discuss.cakewalk.com/index.php?/forum/33-product-release-info/

 

BandLab runs inside a web-browser, primarily Chrome.

Cakewalk by BandLab is a Windows program.

The only similarity is both are free DAWs.

Try them both as see which one is for you.

Maybe you will like both.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scook

Thanks for the reply.    So I would need to learn each because they are different interfaces (Bandlab online and Cakewalk by Bandlab)?

Here is the page where I read what I thought says it's not being updated, under Con - Old Code, pretty far down the page.  Did I misunderstand?

https://www.slant.co/versus/6429/26342/~pro-tools-2018-7_vs_cakewalk-by-bandlab

 

Edited by DallasSteve
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DallasSteve said:

So I would need to learn each because they are different interfaces (Bandlab online and Cakewalk by Bandlab)?

Only if you want to use both of them.

 

WRT program updates one only has to look at the link I provided above to see Cakewalk by BandLab is actively being developed. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DallasSteve said:

  I've read that Cakewalk By Bandlab is not being updated . . . .

Found it (under cons): "Since more than a decade ago no function has been improved."  Possibly you misunderstood this phrase. Possibly Slant is not as clear as it could be. 

As you commented, it is under the "Old Code."  To me it seems they are using "function" in a technical sense--as in functions, function calls, routines, etc. in the programming code.  Unless you know programming languages, you might not realize this and might read it in a general sense--user features v. computer code functions.

I think Slant is saying/trying to say that the computer code used to build the program users install has not yet been rewritten from scratch and uses computer code that hasn't been tweaked/retooled/made more efficient,  expanded upon/re-structured, etc.

That being said, from all the changes (bug fixes, improvements,  new features, etc.) I have seen over the past decade, I cannot imagine the code itself has not been changed.  But, I have never tried to reverse engineer the current version and a version from 10 years ago and I have no desire to do so.

Nevertheless, it is hard for me to imagine (as a user), that no function [in the code] has been improved over the past decade. I have reported a few issues I experienced and the developers have fixed them.  My guess was that changes didn't square with prior code and that the code was changed so as to fix the issues.

If you look at the history of changes just over the past year, much has changed in terms of Cakewalk's features and performance.  

If Slant meant that Cakewalk has been essentially using and building on the UI implemented with SONAR X1 but that many of the parts of the UI are still part of Cakewalk--Track View, Piano Roll View, Console, Browser, Event List, etc. (i.e., it hasn't been revised from the ground up and made to look totally different), that is a different matter.  

Maybe that's what they meant by the "Old Code" section and they weren't referring to functions in the technical sense.   

--------------------------------------

Aside: I also think their "Does not respect your freedom" diatribe is misleading and based on a hyper-restricted sense of "freedom" which I suspect comes from a technical, computer programming-activist stance. For an introduction to the complexities of "free as in freedom" mantra, see, for example, this.  

I might have missed it, but I didn't see sufficient credit given to Cakewalk's extreme flexibility and user customizability. Yes, there is a reference to customizability and the Theme Editor, but for me there is so much more that Cakewalk offers to support users' freedom to create. To take just one example, Cakewalk's Workspaces framework allows users to customize the UI with multiple user presets that are in essence personal workflows.

To me that shows respect and dedication to the users' freedom to work in a ways that best meet their needs.

There's much more (in my opinion) but I only mention this example here as I believe there is similar potential for misinterpretation.  I suspect the "Does not respect your freedom" criticism is based on a highly specialized, computer programming  activism stance.  Unfortunately, if you don't know about that technical, limited meaning, it is possible to draw erroneous conclusions.

I could be wrong.  

------------

Apologies to those who just want short, pithy comments and to anyone whose toes I might have stepped on.

 

 

Edited by User 905133
to add an apology
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, User 905133 said:

Found it (under cons): "Since more than a decade ago no function has been improved."  Possibly you misunderstood this phrase. Possibly Slant is not as clear as it could be. 

As you commented, it is under the "Old Code."  To me it seems they are using "function" in a technical sense--as in functions, function calls, routines, etc. in the programming code.  Unless you know programming languages, you might not realize this and might read it in a general sense--user features v. computer code functions.

I think Slant is saying/trying to say that the computer code used to build the program users install has not yet been rewritten from scratch and uses computer code that hasn't been tweaked/retooled/made more efficient,  expanded upon/re-structured, etc.

 

Yes, that and this finishing comment in that Con:  "there are important components of that DAW that haven't been touched for almost two decades, and they will likely never get the upgrade they need."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, User 905133 said:

the computer code used to build the program users install has not yet been rewritten from scratch and uses computer code that hasn't been tweaked/retooled/made more efficient,  expanded upon/re-structured, etc.

🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, User 905133 said:

As you commented, it is under the "Old Code."  To me it seems they are using "function" in a technical sense--as in functions, function calls, routines, etc. in the programming code.  Unless you know programming languages, you might not realize this and might read it in a general sense--user features v. computer code functions.

 

Actually, I'm a retired computer programmer (C#) so I understand what a computer "function" is.  When they wrote "Since more than a decade ago no function has been improved" I thought they were referring to "function" in the layman sense of what functions the DAW can perform, but I'm not sure which was their intent.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DallasSteve said:

Yes, that and this finishing comment in that Con:  "there are important components of that DAW that haven't been touched for almost two decades, and they will likely never get the upgrade they need."

Yup!  Unfortunately, there is no way to tell if the following is what they had in mind or if they were thinking of other "important components . . . that haven't been touched for almost two decades." I just took a guess, but who knows what they had in mind. 

1 hour ago, User 905133 said:

If Slant meant that Cakewalk has been essentially using and building on the UI implemented with SONAR X1 but that many of the parts of the UI are still part of Cakewalk--Track View, Piano Roll View, Console, Browser, Event List, etc. (i.e., it hasn't been revised from the ground up and made to look totally different), that is a different matter.  

UPDATE: I just checked the SONAR X1 on my XP PC: (c) 2001-2002. That fits with "almost two decades ago." But again, who knows what they had in mind. 

Edited by User 905133
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No DAW is perfect. And most free DAW's are a huge waist of time because they are very limited in features. 

 Cakewalk is a $500 DAW that the new owners just happen to feel like giving away with very few strings attached.  

And a big plus is real good support. Both from Staff and from the Community here. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pwalpwal said:

bandlab is an online thing that runs in chrome, cakewalk is a mature daw that's existed for years (even before your internet!)

I actually bought Cakewalk in a big box back in the 1980s.  It hurts me to think that I paid about $100 (1980s dollars) for it back then, and it wasn't nearly as sophisticated as the later versions.  I bought it again online about 10 years ago; that time I think it was about $40.  So is Cakewalk by Bandlab really old Sonar or is it really the old Cakewalk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but that article is so full of misguided nonsense I'm not even going to bother commenting. For one I'm not sure when it was posted since the information is completely out of date and speculates on things the author clearly has no knowledge about.

I will comment on the commonly quoted reference about "old code". Developers don't rewrite code unless it makes sense to do so. Cakewalk is continually being refactored and new features being added while actively improving the existing features. I wish people didn't write stuff they have no understanding about :(

Here is a link to an article that mentions all the achievements since BandLab acquired Cakewalk. The link Scook posted covers in detail all the improvements and updates to existing features.
 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, DallasSteve said:

scook

Thanks for the reply.    So I would need to learn each because they are different interfaces (Bandlab online and Cakewalk by Bandlab)?

Here is the page where I read what I thought says it's not being updated, under Con - Old Code, pretty far down the page.  Did I misunderstand?

https://www.slant.co/versus/6429/26342/~pro-tools-2018-7_vs_cakewalk-by-bandlab

 

I can say Cakewalk is better than many DAWS there. I used Fl studio. CUbase, Studio One. I like Cakewalk and information in article there isn't true, i think people prefer paid products but Cakewalk is better than many paid products. I see Cakewalk in future as best DAW of all. I was obsessed with Studio one but i started to use Cakewalk and i like it and i don't need Studio one anymore.

Edited by solarlux
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...