Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'toneboosters'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • News & Announcements
    • Product Release Info
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Cakewalk Products
    • Cakewalk by BandLab
    • Instruments & Effects
    • Feedback Loop
  • Community
    • Tutorials
    • Songs
    • UI Themes
    • The Coffee House v2.0

Product Groups

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me

Found 2 results

  1. Hello fellow musicians, I know that headphone mixing will never be ideal, but I´m trying to make the best out of it. After testing Sonarworks Reference 4 and Toneboosters Morphit, I came up with 2 very different results, and they are so radically different that I´m sure one of them must be way better than the other, or at least it seems that they would bring up VERY different results for mixing and even more for mastering With both of them set to my specific cans (Sony MDR 7506 plugged in a MOTU): Morphit sounds very nice and full, very pleasant to hear and a setting that could sure be used to correct the phones for monitoring or listening to everyday music. On the other hand, Reference 4 sounds really "boring" flat, not full and overall dull. (like the general consensus says an ideal mixing reference should be.) Now, listening to one mix with Morphit it sounds very close to ready, but with Reference 4 it seems like there´s still a lot of eq and frequency boosting to be done. I know by heart and read a lot about the importance of a flat reference to mix, but if it is totally or as flat as possible, would it not lead to an "exaggerated" mix result? Because as I said earlier, I would have to boost a loot of frequencies to make the mix sound on Reference 4 as good as it sounds on Morphit. Can anybody shed some light on the subject? Because for me is a real mystery how both products are sold like THE solution for headphone mixing, but sound REALLY different. Cheers!
  2. An impressive piece of technology: harmonic synthesis, saturation, spatial image enhancement, dynamic range adjustment, timbre adjustment, artificial intelligence! Most importantly the resulting enhancement sounds very natural. Triple-band spectral enhancer Spatial width enhancer Timbre adjustment Dynamic range adjustment Overall dry/wet control Spectral monitor Easy to use, scalable interface VST, VST3, AU, AAX format 32-384 kHz sample rate 16 channel support (VST3, AU, AAX) €39 https://www.toneboosters.com/tb_enhancer_v1.html Plus- ToneBoosters plug-in installer v1.2.6 is available now with a variety of updates and improvements. Change log available here: www.toneboosters.com/changelog.html
×
×
  • Create New...