Jump to content

FJ Lamela

Members
  • Posts

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FJ Lamela

  1. 8 hours ago, heath row said:

    With regards to the popup dodad, I personally don't don't think it should be removed, but another added at the end, when you go to exit out you get hit with another popup just in case you have forgotten the firsts message whilst working away, no? I think that would be a good idea.

    You have a great sense of humor, but beyond the joke, pop up screen are a nuisance

  2. As a professional user of Cakewalk in its beginnings until Sonar and in this last stage with Bandlab,

    I do not understand this suicidal step (in my opinion) of the program developers.

    As a veteran user of a software that I have also publicly supported unconditionally, I think that giving us a pop up screen with which we have to wait 20 seconds to start working is not the best way to invite us to continue with your next paid software update that is announced in that notification.

    I really see it as an insult to all of us who have relied on this software over the years.

    I would like to be understood,

    I have always admired the efficiency, simplicity and robustness with which I have worked with Cakewalk/sonar/Bandlab as well as with their innovations that have later been incorporated into other competing DAWs.

    But the reality in 2024 is very different, there are many DAWs that offer many innovations and possibilities in the workflow, dsp, etc... that far exceed what this software and its next paid update offer so far. .

    Cakewalk has not had many users in my opinion, but it has had LOYAL USERS.

    Make loyal users go through:

    1.- Impossibility of being registered offline.

    2.- Need to authorize online registration from time to time.

    3.- Show a pop up screen and wait 20 seconds until you can start working.

    All this for being loyal to a software that also stops being updated and that will soon become obsolete (due to how quickly the world of software in general and the musical world in particular is progressing), in my opinion, It does not give us the place that belongs to us

    I hope and wish that the software team will reconsider (just as the waves audio team did at the time) in the face of this wrong path, which will only make many users abandon a software that may have a great future, but a  market strategy wrong (in my opinion).

    Thank you for reading, I hope I haven't offended anyone and please forgive my English.

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
  3. As the header says, these plugins do not work properly, specifically the group function that is basic for automatic mixing by layers, etc. After doing several tests it seems that the plugins cannot communicate so groups cannot be made with the different tracks in which the plugins are inserted. The same thing happens in smart EQ3 and smart EQ4. They do not work in vst2 or vst3. In Studio one (latest version) and Cubase (latest version) it works properly without any problem. Any solution?. Thank you

  4. 8 hours ago, Noel Borthwick said:

    Please note: The main post has been updated to 28.11.0.012

    This build contains the following additional improvements:

    Quick group support for:

    • Track effect bin Bypass
    • Track effect bin Delete Effect (hold down CTRL+SHIFT to also remove an effect from any FX Chains within the selected tracks)
    • Individual effect bypass

    Fix: Orphaned envelope cannot be reassigned after replacing effect

    Fix: Envelopes are orphaned after undoing track effect bin Delete Effect

    Fix: [Regression] Track Inspector flickers and draws after the main app window is drawn when opening a project

    Thanks a lot Noel.

    Thanks for all your work!

  5. Sorry what is the insult?.

    I ask you seriously? I have not used any swear words, or bad-sounding words. Can you please point out what the insult is?

    I wanted to express that I did not want to do anything mandatory, I wanted to say that it was a possibility, but it was clear that you did not understand that I did not want to force anything. If you consider that an insult, then I'm sorry, but I repeat, it was not my intention.

    And I repeat my native language is not English, it may be that some phrases are made incorrectly but I do not think that with this I insult anyone.

     

  6. 1 hour ago, Will. said:

    My messages gets deleted and I get a warning because this guy literally calls me stupid after I had given him advice on this feature that is already available is CbB? 

    Okay.

    I have never insulted anyone in any forum. I haven't insulted you either.

    If that has seemed to you, I apologize but it was not my intention.

    My native language is not English, maybe the way I express myself is not correct but I have not intended to insult anyone.

  7. 20 minutes ago, murat k. said:

    It does what you want. Tracks come as two separate mono tracks belongs to two different channels which were panned hard left and hard right.

    But yes, description can be like "Import as separate mono tracks" When I first saw it, I thought it'll turn it to a mono track when importing.

    Thank you, I thought it was just me who had thought like that

  8. 8 hours ago, Will. said:

    You can split it yourself.

    What if you dont want the stereo track to be split on import to save some track space | OR | because it doesnt need extra work done on it? 

    Do you understand what "posibility" means ?.  Of course you dont.

    Posibility is the option of, It is not the obligation of.

    Having options in a software is always something positive and for users it is a plus.

×
×
  • Create New...