Bruno de Souza Lino

This is something that is possible to do in REAPER:

On CbB, all you have is changing a DSP option in a external options file and that may not even do anything. While I can dial lower latencies with REAPER with WASAPI shared, on CbB, I seem to be stuck in 400ms with no provisions of changing it.

Hi.

I've been trying to create a tempo map for a song by using AudioSnap to mark the transients. It's been working fine until I got  almost 3 minutes into doing it. Now AudioSnap is starting to complain about "Invalid measures and beats" and giving crap values on the average tempo as shown here:

I figured maybe the audio clip is too long and split it at some point. Not only that didn't fix the problem, but this happens?

And the same error continues.

Since there's no other practical form of doing that ( tapping the tempo manually with midi then using fit to improvise would take three times longer because I can't have waveforms laid on the piano roll like you can in FL Studio), I must stop and wonder how much Audio Snap was tested for this purpose.

On 3/25/2021 at 3:22 AM, Hatstand said:

The crowd was so small actually got to sit with him for a chat afterwards

It helps when the rest of the crowd is the band.

B is for Blotted Science

Music.

Here's some classical.

Nancarrow was doing Black MIDI before the MIDI standard even existed.

I was banned from the Kerbal Space Program forums three times.

On 3/24/2021 at 10:53 PM, Shane_B. said:

I wouldn't be surprised to hear they are changing the name to Sonar by Bandlab ...

I doubt it. Some nutcases might be offended by submarines and experience pstd effects from a war they never fought in that doesn't exist.

This is what happens when you have a heated argument about tone woods.

On 3/20/2021 at 2:45 PM, Salvatore Monella said:

You can get audio to do the same by clicking the left one.

I mean... It's not like they could use Bandlab for that sort of thing...or anything like that..

On 3/27/2021 at 2:39 PM, Paul Young said:

 Image Line is very good at preventing this,

Image Line is also very good at shafting their own legitimate customers if they suspect they are pirating a product.

Shouldn't the whole "getting paid" thing be a consequence of you finding an audience, rather than something you think you should deserve?

On 3/27/2021 at 5:20 PM, craigb said:

Also, FLAC files can also provide a resolution of up to 32-bit, 96kHz, which is even better than the standard CD!

And you win precisely nothing with that, especially considering music is compressed to be louder and you have permanent hearing loss at the maximum headroom of 32 bit audio. Higher sample rates have become unnecessary after the introduction of oversampling in plugins and so on. Plus you can't hear the extra 24 thousand frequencies added by the sample rate anyways. Only advantage would be file size but then... You'll find many instances where FLAC files are larger than their WAV equivalents.

5 hours ago, Tezza said:

Because he wanted to.

No wonder K-Pop and Instagram playing are so popular.

8 hours ago, TheSteven said:

+1
but  that's kind of hard to do while you're waiting for a traffic light or your zoom meeting to start - the Tenuto phone app is great for using those moments that would otherwise go to waste for tweaking your ears.

I find ironic that you paid quite a lot for an ear training course when you can't even be bothered to dedicate time for something like transcribing, having to squeeze it in between busy hours as an afterthought.

There's another extremely effective way of doing ear training that doesn't cost anything: transcribing music.

1 hour ago, Tezza said:

I wouldn't describe it as "fake" though. It's him singing, he has just recorded the performance professionally and then mimed to it in the video, like every other music clip ever made in the world. The only difference is he is playing an acoustic guitar in a relaxed setting. That's just what he wanted to do to get a better sound, there's no conspiracy behind it. Still a nice cover of this song on just acoustic guitar and vocals.

Why would you record something professionally and make it look like it was a home recording?

On 3/13/2021 at 6:51 PM, Tezza said:

Yes, I think it was professionally recorded and edited, you can hear some tuning correction on the voice in quick step downs and the clarity and presence of the voice is amazing, reverb is nice. Then he probably did a number of attempts at doing the video overdub. It does not detract from the quality of his voice though, the range, control, emotion, choice of alternate notes, the delivery....all great.

I am using it as a benchmark for my acoustic/vocal recordings. You don't usually hear voice and guitar alone presented with such quality.

I don't think he's the one singing these. Why fake what's real? If it's the guy really singing and playing, why mime a fake performance?

Now, this looks like a plain old music theory course disguised to not look like one.

Also, there are some strange things:

You get the first fourteen chapters, but the bold ones are free of charge? how that works? Also, the bold chapters amount to fifteen modules. Is there a 21st module we're not seeing? What are you paying for? 5 chapters? Someone really needs to make a better landing page.

I don't know Rick's qualification's on these things but...The educational content I've seen posted on his YouTube page is quite mediocre in many aspects.

This is a sort of small project I badly put together with little regard to several things. It was a sad day that day and neither of the band member could agree where the lyrics would go nor how to structure the song, so they went for this instead.

14 minutes ago, InstrEd said:

True.  But with the shut-down one of the choir members is a music school teacher and used another Web-based program to have choir members record simple pieces and she put it together.   So I guess I was thinking out loud on how Bandlab could of also been used here between us musicians and the choir. I can't remember what she used but the school has an account so we were able to do limited stuff for free.  

Sure. There's still some marketing going on in that regard. You start using Cakewalk, then you go into that thing when Bandlab "comes to you" and goes "By the way, did you know we also have a place where you can master your stuff for free and host your music. We also have sample packs too!"

Well, that will depend on how profitable the DAW is into making people make use of the other Bandlab products IMO. Companies don't do software as a "labor of love" after all.

On 3/14/2021 at 4:24 PM, Peter - IK Multimedia said:

LOL someone is making assumptions I see.   If only you were privy to the figures of what we've sold for AmpliTube 5 from release until now (well I report on it weekly so I know off the top of my head as of through last Thursday... and there are a lot of digits.  To the left of the decimal.).

I hope IK doesn't occupy so much real estate in your mind for a long time, that seems unhealthy.  I probably shouldn't point out how successful a product is selling as it probably makes that plot of real estate grow even more, but unfortunately I must dispel such misinformation when I see it.

If you need a mentor to also explain some of the marketing benefits of offers such as you see here with Thomann and IK, I suppose I could also spare some time but I'd also ask that you share exactly what issues you have with IK that cause an unhealthy obsession as a nice trade in kind.

Should I be feeling envious? Offended? Threatened? Humiliated? Some hints would be helpful cause I'm having a hard time here. And not a desirable one.

Someone is not selling enough software it seems...