murat k.

No. You can expand and collapse any of them also including the Inspector instead of either click on a rather tiny button or a keystroke.

Double click to "Separator Bar" instead.

Yeah, Cakewalk is astonishing in every way. I hope the astonishment changes to a good way after the implementation.

Aim Assist digits in front of the marker line. But in a different box that can be independently resizable than the Time Ruler height.

Maybe like that which I requested years ago:

And one of the solutions can be a resizable Time Ruler. By this way we may not need a different position than the inside of the Time Ruler. Also increasing the opacity of the digit box can make it more readable.

In the current situation, Aim Assist digits in the Time Ruler are very small because they're restricted by the height of the Time Ruler. Maybe showing them under the Time Ruler with big fonts can be better for viewing.

+1 for both ideas.

Cakewalk already has a magnifier for PRV called Microscope. So implementing the same thing to work anywhere in the software might be easy since there is already a working code. And that tool can be toggled by a shortcut anywhere when needed.

Finding a way to run 32 bit Dxi in the Cakewalk. That's great! 👍

I read the whole conversation, I guess having a this kind of a thing in the Cakewalk seems solving the issue.

You're welcome @tecknot I'm not using a very different theme than the Tungsten Theme because of this reason, because it is always incomplete.

I'm supporting a Complete Theme Support in the Cakewalk. Here is the full list of the uncustomizable parts in the Cakewalk: BACKGROUNDS Menubar Track Control Areas Track View Bus Envelopes Pane Background Piano Roll View Tracks Pane Piano Roll View Tracks Pane Unselected Track Piano Roll View Musical Snap Resolution Media/Plugin Browser Media/Plugin Browser Search Bar Unactive Notes Pane Arranger Track - Track View Tempo Track - Track View Tempo Track - Inspector View Articulation Maps SynthRack View Control Bar Staff View Tracks Pane Big Time Lyrics View Meter/Key Sysx View TEXT Menubar Track Control Areas Arranger Track - Track View Tempo Track - Track View Tempo Track - Inspector View Articulation Maps Video Now Time Big Time Lyrics View Meter/Key Sysx View Export Module Clip Stretch Percentage Selected Clip Stretch Percentage SCROLL BARS Piano Roll View Tracks Pane Plugin/Media Browser Synth Rack View Event list Lyrics View Meter/Key Sysx View ICONS Piano Roll View Piano Black Bars Multidock Scroll İcons Synth Rack View Synth Background Menubar Icons Loop Construction Vew Horizontal Zoom Control Arranger Sections and Arrangements Area BORDERS Inspector View Left Right Borders Selected Clips Border Track View Track Separator Color Matrix View Notes/Cells Separator Track Icon Border CURVES Selected Clip Fade And this is the Checker which is a Theme&Color settings for to see missing parts directly: Checker.zip

Yeah, and I'm talking about a full integration. After the integration, it will be like seeing and using Musescore in the Staff View just like a part of the Cakewalk. I think Musescore contributors would welcome this kind of collaboration request when it comes from a DAW like Cakewalk. This step can also allow for both software to create an API just like ARA developed in a collaboration between Celemony Software and PreSonus, then it will make possible to any Music Notation Software integration to any DAW.

For now yes. But it can be. I'm asking to the Bakers, may you want to integrate Musescore to the Cakewalk? As Glenn said it would be great to have an application integrated in the Cakewalk like Melodyne. Musescore is an opensource application but Cakewalk developing such an implemantation alone may not be convenient, so something like this to happen, a collaboration with the Musescore team would be a right approach. Both softwares will start to communicate with each other after the integration. For example when you use an Articulation Map for Staccato, already binded Articulation Map to the Note Articulation wil turn notes in the Musescore to Staccato automatically. I don't know if either side would be willing to do. But this kind of a collaboration can fix the gap between the Music Notation and DAW softwares. Then each software can focus their own profession with using each others strengths.

I realized that I missed out your idea. Yes, if it was possible ARA like mechanism for MIDI to Muse Score would be awesome. with dark settings for sure 🙂

You need more light in your screen if your environment is bright, and this is not related to the dark or bright theme. Because the screens of today needs more backlight in a bright environment only if you don't use a screen which use e-ink. But yes, white screen is bearable in the daytime compared to the night but still it is not good for eyes. And coming to the topic, the Staff View, having a dark theme in the Staff View will make it usable anytime of the day regardless of the enviroment light you have.

You say it without knowing it actually. White screen and sun is almost the same thing for eyes. When the retina’s light-sensing cells become over-stimulated from looking at a bright light, they release massive amounts of signaling chemicals, injuring the back of the eye as a result. I'm just stating what I know.

I agree with the idea of seeing and editing Articulation Maps in Track View. It will be helpful to see multiple things at once. Similar request for the Staff View :

Thanks for the information. If Studio One is doing the thing with the same way with the Cakewalk it doesn't seem helping the issue. It needs to be dynamically creating staff when you add notes as I stated earlier. Dark Theme is a needed feature. With the white screen my eyes are bleeding. You can do a photon ray bombardment your eyes anytime by the way. And as I stated earlier this topic is about improving the Staff View, PRV is out of topic. And he also mentioned that he doesn't want to have to use another software.

It seems that some other DAWs already found a way to deal with the issue. This image is from Studio One: Also it has a Dark Theme which is good for eye health: The DAWs of today are not focusing a specific task. They are leading a way to do many things together. And I don't want Cakewalk to lag behind that.

Cakewalk is getting better with every update. There are couple of major things left to implement. Integrated Sampler is one of them. Talking about it without knowing it's development situation is not helping, so we need a declaration from the Bakers.

Yeah you are right about that. But he used "plugin" word for other stuff. So you can get it from there. Also VST advice came after my post which made the request obvious. And this is a general advice for forum users:

No. When someone requests for a "built-in sampler "and you came up with "use a plug-in sampler" this is the most inappropriate thing to do in a feature request topic. Also when the word "built-in" is used in front of the word "sampler", means there is also a "plug-in" version of it. So there is no need to be a wise person to get it. Instead of advising by considering that the person who asks for something doesn't know anything, reading the OP carefully and comprehending the situation of the asker and the asked thing, then keeping things in a concept will help you to help people better.

I'm sure that everyone knows about it so it's funny that you think it wasn't thought. No. You will not opt to use a VST for that because it is not an option. You have to. But after the implementation, yes you can opt to use a VST for that.