Jump to content

AB9

Members
  • Posts

    185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AB9

  1. Nice post. It can be a win-win. Bandlab can get credibility with a professional DAW in its ranks. And hopefully, revenues from Sonar, whether through the subscription and/or other means, goes to Sonar staff and Sonar R&D to make it sustainable and a continued evolving product. Some may go to overhead, but that is ok too, as long as it does not drain the money reasonably needed for Sonar staff and Sonar R&D.
  2. I think so - I said it was " only like a demo at this point, if the monthly (or annual) subsciption is not purchased. But apparently, you are indicating that one can save and exprrt during the three day trial. If that is true, then my post above is inaccurate and I appreciate your correction. Either way, I believe we are both saying the same thing for the subsciption - one gets full access and can save, export, etc. And as I stated above, the subscription can be canceled for whatever reason, including any better option down the road.
  3. I assume with the subscription - one can save and export Sonar projects. If that is so, then it is only like a demo at this point, if the monthly (or annual) subsciption is not purchased. So that is about $15 a month for the current subscription offering. If somehow Sonar gets released in a way that costs less, than cancel the subscription as stated above. Meanwhile, I think it is good that people are expressing a variety of comments.
  4. It should be kept in mind that the purchasers generally do not "own" the software. It is generally a "license" - which is something short of full ownership. So you can have permission to use it under certain contractual provisions. I subscribe to Adobe Pro and Google Drive (5 T), Microsoft 365, etc. Not an issue. Under the old Cakewalk/Sonar days, there was a one-time charge and there were charges for updates. The need to buy the updates was often there. Reliant operating systems changed, VST arose and changed, etc. And there were unstable times in terms of the actual "owners" of the software - not the consumers and not really the software itself. As stated before, if the Bakers do not get paid well, this will not be sustainable, and that is a lose-lose. If Bandlab overcharges, then they will not make it in the market. It seems that they know that. For those that disdain subscriptions as stated on the forum, they are certainly entitled to their opinion and I think it is good that the opinion is voiced, so Bandlab knows that there is a group of people that feel that way, even if I am not so concerned. Now I am seriously going to open up some Skinny Pop!
  5. I sort of took from Noel's post, that if one buys the bandlab membership, then that includes Sonar and that there would be no price increase for those who bought that membership to keep Sonar. If that is wrong, please advise. Thank you.
  6. Here is a way I am looking at it for now: I am purchasing Sonar by buying the bandlab membership. And I am considering that the bandlab membership is basically of no cost. The price for Sonar, including its continued sustainabability with enough funds, and updates, is all worth it for the price of the bandlab membership. (I am not saying this for "Next." And I certainly support those that want other pricing. But if the price is too low and the Bakers cannot make a decent salary, etc., then eventually we have an unstable platform.)
  7. Thank you Noel. So the bandlab membership includes Sonar, with no extra fee beyond the bandlab membership. And if one is a bandlab member, then there is no additional fee for Sonar. All good inho. That is fair pricing. And no one has to use the other membership perks. And as you said, if later they figure out other Sonar pricing that does not include the membership, great.
  8. I do not mind the subscription or plan idea at all. I have asked some questions for clarification - such as - does bandlab membership include Sonar - with no extra fee? Just want to know. I do think it is time for Bandlab to start clarifying pricing, whatever it is. There are often critiques on this forum and almost always they are made to make sure the product and presentation of the product improves. Imho, no one should abandon Cakewalk or Sonar. It is a great, deep, reliable program and for me, it is especially important because I can open files from decades ago in various iterations of Cakewalk/Sonar. And good luck finding a DAW with as helpful people as the Bakers with this forum, etc.
  9. So, for clarity, if one buys the Bandlab membership subsciption, does that person have to pay an additional price for Sonar later? Or will the Sonar price be included in that membership for the foreseeable future? The bandlab membership price, if it includes Sonar without an additional Sonar price later, is fair. One doesn't need to use the other bandlab membership services.
  10. Makes sense. And I am not complaining. The Bakers are super fantastic. And Sonar and CbB are fabulous. I just want to clarify that after the three days, use of Sonar and being able to save it - is about membership - whether paid monthly or annually. That is why the Website states about how to gain access to Backstage Pass and then provides a link to "Get Membership": "How to gain access to Backstage Pass If you’re currently a BandLab Member, you’ll be able to access these experimental features now. We’ll catch you backstage! Get Membership"'
  11. This is from their website at https://blog.bandlab.com/introduction-to-backstage-pass/ "How to gain access to Backstage Pass If you’re currently a BandLab Member, you’ll be able to access these experimental features now. We’ll catch you backstage! Get Membership"' Why doesn't it say: "Get Backstage Pass" It seems like backstage pass (after 3 days) is membership.
  12. I hear you. Universal Audio gives a 14 day demo on a plugin. Imagine how much more time is needed to check out an entire DAW!
  13. Thank you all. I can see where there is a 3 day demo so to speak. Perhaps that is what is meant by Backstage pass. Other than the 3 day demo, the only other thing is a subscription - either by month or by year. So, if I am correct, there is no pass beyond 3 days without bandlab membership.
  14. So, what is the exact link for buying a backstage pass, if somehow this is different from membership? I can find membership. Thanks!
  15. It is a "cakewalk" to use it. The overall name makes sense. It is relatively simple and easy to get great results in recording. I first got into it because it was Windows based and had (and has) great midi implementation. It is still much easier for me to wrap my mind around it, than Cubase for example. That fact that it is a "cakewalk" does not mean that it is not deep. It is deep, and allows for many layers of knowledge for its use. But that does not mean it is complicated to use. It is easy make a great product. And it comes with a super forum and staff people that are very attentive, kind, knowledgeable and approachable! That is worth a lot! My 2 cents.
  16. AB9

    Windows 12

    99% of dentists recommend Windows 10.
  17. Are there any issues at all about having Sonar and CWB on the C drive? Any reduction of performance of either noted?
  18. Is this new Sonar still in the beta phase? I assume when it is out of beta there will be a major announcement, etc.
  19. AB9

    Windows 12

    I hear you. Frankly, I like Windows 10 better than Windows 11. Windows 11 messed with the explorer menu and I thought Windows 10 was better. Sometimes it seems like MS just makes changes for the purpose of making changes, rather than fixing problems. But if these changes are going to come down the pike, and if eventually Windows 10 is not going to be serviced anymore by MS, we do not need to know what is being planned. And of course, what if DAWs and other audio related software starts gearing towards 12? Will that matter to earlier version people?
  20. It seems there are some inklings that Windows 12 might be out this summer. Are there any indications of how this might affect audio, video, and DAWs?
  21. Great! This is along the lines of my post above. But now these events can be livestreamed as well as in person. And with the new Sonar coming out, a Sonar Tour would be really cool, help promote the product, and help create a critical mass of users, so that it is sustaintable for Cakewalk and for use. Perhaps Cakewalk can make a deal with Guitar Center, to use their stores at various locations, And Guitar Center could have a promotion for it.
  22. Pathfinder - you are welcome. You might also check gearspace.com for more discussions on the Lewitt pure tube, the CM-5, etc. Examples: https://gearspace.com/gear/stellar-professional-microphones/cm-5 https://gearspace.com/board/product-alerts-older-than-2-months/1406062-lewitt-releases-pure-tube.html Wishing you great success!
  23. Interesting point on the Stellar. I do find the 47 and 67 quite different from the 87. The only 87 I would suggest is the Stam 87 T (Tube) which is quite different. But I think his best option is to go to a recording studio with many mics, rent mics, or purchase with a credit card several mics with a dealer that has a great return policy. And as I said, it may be the SM7. Thanks for your thoughts on your chain with the SM7b. I suspect that the SM7 Michael Jackson used is a bit different from the new model available today. But I suspect there are good used ones out there of the same version Michael Jackson used.
  24. Based on your artists mentioned, I do not see it being a C12 type mic. Likely more of a 47 or 67 as compared to a 12. I really like the Stam 87t (tube 87 which is not normal) better than any other 87 I have tried. It has an amazing bottom and sweet high end. For 47s, I love the Heisermans but I suspect it is over your budget. Beesneez in Australia make a great 67 that is on the affordable side - in the U.S. - Wind Over The Earth - in Colorado. But Duncan gave a lot of good advice - including that you will never know for sure until you get it in your studio. Might be a good idea to go to a seller that takes returns easily, like Sweetwater, not the best prices but great service. Put several on a credit card. Compare and keep the winner. Another thought is if there is a studio near where you live that you can visit and check out some mics. For all I know, a mic like an SM7, used by Michael Jackson on Thriller, may thrill you! It is not all about price. The only reason I mentioned the Chandler which is not a tube mic, is that it sounds a lot like one and is strangely affordable compared to most chandler products. For live, I am using a Lewitt MTP 550 DM Dynamic Vocal Microphone and I love it. I even like it better than the more expensive Neumann KMS 105s I have for my voice and my wife's voice. I never tried this Lewitt in the studio. I think it is more of a live mic, but heck, who knows. This is a very individual thing, which is why great studios have many, many mics. Michael Jackson chose or was given a lesser expensive mic on what I think is the world's largest selling album (or close to it), and I am sure they could have afforded a much more expensive one. Enjoy!
  25. Sounds like it would have to be mostly online. I suggested in person and livestreamed - presumably with the livestream captured for those that could not make it in the particular time frame. Anyway, just a thought! Cheers!
×
×
  • Create New...