Jump to content

Milton Sica

Members
  • Posts

    754
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Milton Sica

  1. In this channel you found https://www.youtube.com/@CreativeSauce/videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF64xNsM8T8&t=923s&pp=ugMICgJwdBABGAHKBRZjcmVhdGl2ZSBzYXVjZSBrb250YWt0 https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=creative+sauce+kontakt
  2. I cleaned it with spray contact cleaner and the problem still remained. The knobs remained centered. I had the idea of leaving them completely on one side and that is solving the problem.
  3. For some reason I don't know (USB cable ????, already changed) my NANO KONTROL 2 is randomly moving the PAN Knobs and only this control. Any tips?
  4. To create automation tracks in the MT Power Drum Kit, follow the steps below. 1) Include the plugin with audio tracks, as shown in the image below. 2 - In audio channel 1 created by clicking on the button to automate a control, choose the desired parameter. The parameter used to control the overall volume of all drum parts is Global Volume. Comments: 1 - The plugin documentation does not cover this procedure. 2 - Automation as described is only available on the first track that receives channel 1 of the plugin.
  5. Researching the plugin's features further, I discovered that it is possible to automate the GENERAL PLUGIN VOLUME by following the steps below. 1) Include the plugin with audio tracks, as shown in the image below. 2 - On audio channel 1 created by clicking the button to automate a control, choose the Global Volume parameter. This procedure will allow me to automate the volume that was my desire and, now that I discovered it, all the others in the plugin.
  6. I bring to record something that happened this morning and that I found a solution for. Certainly those more experienced in the tool will be able to clarify the origin of the problem. The case: 1 - I use a project in my work routine only to do the final mastering. 2 - This project has some plugins, as seen in the attached image. 3 - I didn't close the project last night and went back to work on it in the morning. 4 - This consists of importing the WAV file generated in the mixing into this project and reevaluating it using the TR5 Master Match, which has a reference to maintain the same final standards as the album I am building. 5 - When applying the operations suggested by TR5 there was a HUGE EXPLODE IN VOLUME. 6 - I decided to close the mastering project and start all the previous steps. This corrected what was wrong.
  7. I just commented that, in the past, developers did a lot of this intermediation for countless other plugins, considering the importance of keeping users connected and productive with their productions. At no point did I say that this done in the past was an obligation of the team. He said he hoped this would be done, maintaining the favors previously performed.
  8. I believe so, but it is limited to the use of the parts.
  9. Yes. In other times, the developers themselves made these contacts with the plugin developers trying to enable better integrations with the application. That's what I expected from the team.
  10. Would it be possible for the program to issue this alert when it identifies this problem when trying to create each automation? Something like: Attention ! This plugin doesn't respond to CC #7.
  11. Automation on MIDI channel is not processed. In this case I did Speed and the sound remains.
  12. There are constant reports of slowness from users of the latest version. There is this specific topic and also in the feedback post, but these comments seem to be relegated to the third or fourth level, if not at all, with the search for a justification always being sought. One time it's Kontakt, another time a plugin, another time configuring the user's station and so on. And I'll reinforce: yes, the program is slower to load projects.
  13. Thank you, but the combination CTRL - SHIFT - MOUSE in my installation does cause horizontal/vertical locking, in addition to copying the content than when selected. Apart from this evaluation, were you able to reproduce the error that happened to me?
  14. OCCURRENCE Steps to replicate the issue: 1) Copy an audio block using CTRL + SHIFT + PRESSED MOUSE BUTTON, DRAG TO THE DESIRED POSITION. 2) Create FX region 3) Choose VOCALSYNC. For me the application aborted without any type of message.
  15. This expression "isn't new in this update" is interesting. I have a suggestion that could perhaps help resolve bugs: Why don't you post a version-specific topic that addresses something like a list of what you are actually looking to fix. Thus, the large group of users, many including developers or former developers, could dedicate ourselves to helping them with solutions, simulating. As it is, we, users, are left guessing on our side while on your side something else takes priority. It's just a suggestion from someone who has worked in development for over 30 years.
  16. I thought this too and, in some projects, this marking did not change the behavior of the keys, but in this case it did.
  17. Yes. I discovered in Editing Preferences they were marked MERGE OLD AND NEW. I checked REPLACE OLD WITH NEW and it returned to the behavior I expected.
  18. Thanks for the help, but I identified that it is something in the project settings, as in some it works as expected and in a new one it doesn't. I'll investigate.
  19. Sorry, I was wrong about the side of the button. The left mouse button. I tried again and found that the cut was made, but in a completely different position from where the cursor/position was. I commanded the cut at the cursor position. See where the cut was made.
  20. @msmcleod In a new project: 1) I made the recording. 2) I used the SMART tool. 3) I positioned where I want to make a cut. 4) I pressed ALT and the cutting scissors appeared, but even pressing the right button, which was what I had been doing until then to cut, this did not happen.
  21. I have a great curiosity to be clarified. I know this is not the type of post for this topic, but I am very curious to realize that several friends on the forum who are not part of the development team address various solutions, directions, corrections, predictions, explanations as if they had access to some kind of of privileged information. Would this be possible?
  22. I don't believe this is the correct statement, as it would not be common sense for the marketing of the incoming product. I strongly believe that the company and its developers are committed to correcting as many of the imperfections reported in this "latest" version as possible.
  23. I am convinced that this team of developers and the company itself will not launch a new product, leaving behind countless bugs in the legacy version. I thought that this would be a very dangerous strategy, when we know that there will be several platforms for the creation and production of
  24. This is very good, because, contrary to what many users here insist with the most varied arguments when justifying information about reported bugs, it is important to know that the team is always attentive to, in fact and tirelessly, verifying the existence of the bug. Many of them, in fact, true and existing. The issue of the low performance of this latest update is something that, I reiterate, is certainly also being verified by the developers to whom I congratulate. Is there a forecast for the release of a new update?
  25. After tireless testing with old projects and some new ones, I am very clear that this version is much slower in operations, opening, closing, saving. I cannot conceive that this will be the last free version and, above all, there will be no rollback to the last version. These facts are fully reported by several forum friends in their comments.
×
×
  • Create New...