Will.

If you open the console and go to the "Module Tab" theres options to remove the widgets you dont want. Problem with this is - it's globally not per buss or per track. It's only the "Strips Volume" Meter that you can hide per buss or track.

Wont the purpose of it be Stereo that why only the interleave will stay put. For when you do your A/B comparison in the Master process between mono and stereo? This is exactly why I brought this up. Cause I'm routing digitally in this sense. There's also a few steps and ideas digitally you're giving here with this - to work only with the CbB console in that sense. ☺ True not everyone works in CbB as advance as others. Some barely scratch the surface of CbB. That's why I sometimes go crazy here 😂 But that's because I use CbB to its full potential "digitally" and because there place for improvement.

Thats why we create 2 or 3 Master tracks in the mixing process to control and balance out certain elements or to further create headroom space when giving the illusion something has been recorded "live" - when it was not. As for your "surround sound track" You that on the mix buss and Master it on your Dedicated Master track. That is why this will be an OPTION for you to choose and save it to your blank/empty template.

Read carefully! The ability to "Disable/Hide" them (the controls) - is already there. That is what I said. Why would I want to do that? When the topic is to have a dedicated MASTER TRACK that cant be deleted. 😐

Hide it how? Meaning, how will that benefit the user? It can be hidden now, but I'm trying to understand how it will help.

Thats already there. Why would I want to hide the features if a dedicated track tbat you can't delete would be a choice. If tracks are not highlighted by selecting them - your files don't get printed. A dedicated track prevents that too. You just need to wrap it with your loop markers.

Wow! You have a lot of problems with your OS. Which build are you on? Try this: Click here And definitely watch this video. A MUST!!! That windows defender? It's a pain in the butt! I've been disabling for 2 years now and smooth running here ever since.

Well, it'll be as the heading reads. A dedicated MASTER track. Here you will do your final writing to your track. Just your interleave and Fx bin to it. This will prevent accidental tweaks on your "FIXED MASTER BUSS" as it is now. I sometimes come across finding this I had accidentally panned lowered the gain or Volume on my Main Master Track/Buss/ Strip/Channel. You can still create your Master 1/2/ but that dedicated Main Master track will be where you print/write/burn your final project from. You'll have the option not to use it. Some of us will prefer to use it. I bet you that you dont even use the hardware system strip - I do.

Why would they come on forums when in the HipHop or EDM genres, theres thousands of new mixing concepts on youtube used by popular nominated young genius producers/mixing and mastering engineers giving tips on Youtube? Also CbB lacks one cruscial tool "A sample editor." The importance of tranposing an 808 or any sample to them with a built-in editor without using third plugins for this -- thats the 1st thing they ask for in a DAW (Can you transpose samples?) This puts you off from convincing them to get onboard, cause you know what the answer will be. I'm satisfied with CbB. I Started using Sonar LE in my early 20's when FL Studio was already sitting at number one in studios in those genre's. Most tracks you heard then - seen on TV and that won awards in the EDM and HipHop genre's were strictly made / recorded / and mixed in FL.

Who thinks a strictly straight forward stripped down dedicated "Master bus track" would be a great addition to the DAW - with only the Mono/Stereo interleave and FX bin on it?

Which ever one will be the easiest coding for the bakers. 😊 Although: a sub folder with a pop-up window to the section highlighted in red, will look cleaner. ☺

Bumping up. Can't we place this section highlighted in red, in a Category/Sub folder on this menu? To keep things organized and to have easy access to section that's highlighted in green?

Yes, during playback - while nudging the moving, or opening it in the PRV while it's playing. I've never come across this before. Isn't it a bug?

Does anyone experience an annoying cutout on synths when nudging, delete, move / or / make changes to other files in the project?

Nice to see you too. Yeah. 😅 All the request has been answered in this update. I'm grateful and enjoying them to the max! Mixing is so much fun now and I Love them. ☺ I still have a big one to pray for and two small requests i'd like to see this year. Anyway . . . Yeah. The ability to transfer/move all the plugins (3rd party plugins too,) that are in your ROCK template, to your custom template for jazz in one-go. Taking whats in your FX BIN to a different template and empty project. Like a "replace template" setting that keeps all your plugins.

Idea came from another topic on here. I don't know how others might feel about this, but let's give it a shot. Requesting a feature to copy all effects in "ONE-GO" from a current project to a different empty template with "different settings" without saving them as a preset. I don't know if this will be possible or not, and what the complications might be to it. The idea is to copy all the effects with their settings "AS IS" to another template - new or empty. If it's possible, great - If not, awesome.

Templates are awesome. I have one where the snap to grid is set for a "Global" setting / and / one other that's not. Like @msmcleod said: Different projects requires and mean different snap to grid settings - especially when a client has drawn in some envelope nodes already. It's always best to leave things the way they want it, often times you'll hear them say "NO" to global settings after you've send them the final project - even if they agree on "global settings" when discussing the project with them. What would've been great is the ability to copy all effects from one template to other in one-go. Maybe I'll create a request this right now. I guess your feature wouldn't hurt to be added in. I don't think it's a meaningless request, but I'd still prefer the template versions to avoid all complications that will/might come with that.

This could possible. Have you tried changing the settings under preferences to the backward setting of Sonar 8.5 where panning was applied on clips instead of the console?

Still works here in 2021.04.175 Try a reinstall.

I hear you and i'm not arguing what you've said. ☺ Feature requests are ideas, right? And suggestions that comes from the replies often bring more ideas to it,right? So why not take whats already there and write that into a pitch bend envelope? Basically we'll just extract the "pitch codes and | pitch shift codes" from the loop construction into an envelope. There's timestretch too. I know its easy to say something, but that's why we're here to ask questions and to understand. Like with midi files, it does this automatically with an envelope without you touching the pitch bend wheel of your keyboard, but my M-Audio keystation has to be switched on everytime I return to the project, unless I dont record it to an Aux track. I'm just mentioning this to bring foward the idea that it is possible to do it without creating a new plugin for that and to use what's already there and fuse those into an pitch bend envelope. If im wrong, tell me. Ideas goes and reach far, some might be to much, but not impossible - much like, how I like the thought of having the "channel tools plugin" as a prochannel module or built-into the track strip for its width settings. We're here to help, suggest and to bring ideas - not to argue. ☺

+1 for a Bump up to keep this one up and running here too. I think I have a similar request somewhere lost as this one. Having this build-in to the DAW, would be a great addition for EDM and Hip Hop projects and the DAW as a whole. Work arounds are great. I use Graillon almost every single time, but it's extra system resources that could've been spared. That's the first thing I look for in a request. Is it saving CPU consumption | or | will it add? And this one will definitely reduce the burden of using an extra plugin. Well deserve bump up!

You need to understand the principle of "depth" and how to apply it.

I think I know what you mean. I sometimes do this when I want to Solo or Mute multiple track together at once. Instead of using CTRL, I hightlight the first track out ofvthe group and go straight to the last track from the once I want to select and press SHIFT+CLICK. From here, I can control the selected tracks and non selected tracks by holding CTRL and click the action i want to do - arm/solo/mute I'm not home to check this now. Working at a different studio; different DAW. What would make this easier on the O.P suggestion/request, is if the track automatically hightlight up between track scroll with the mouse hovering on it. That way just pressing "R" would be of use - I might be wrong. Like I said, im not at my studio to validate what I have suggested here. 😣

Yes, but that arm's every track. I believe that's not what the O.P want.

Or you could highlight the tracks you want to arm, press and hold CTRL and hit the record button. Works every time.