Jump to content

Randall Petty

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Randall Petty

  1. Cakewalk is set up using my interface's asio driver, but I can't get any meters to move.  In Control Panel Sound I can see the meters move for guitar and mic.   Tried setting the first track in Cakewalk to Solo but no indication it's receiving sound.  Doing something similar in Audacity showed monitoring meter movement right off the bat, but Audacity can only use one pair of inputs from the interface.

    Roland HS5 session mixer which has two output or playback channels and numerous input channels

     

    FB_IMG_1598909033173.jpg

  2. I managed to accomplish this in Davinci Resolve first, but the "granularity" of syncing two audio tracks seems to be limited to frames.  So if recorded at 30 frames per second you can only sync in increments of 33 milliseconds.
    Cakewalk allows this "nudging" at a default increment of 10 ms with the option to make that even smaller.
    On the other hand, Resolve has an easy to use "render" function to put out your results to mp4.
    Cakewalk didn't seem to offer a combined export of audio and video other than to "OMF"  ??

  3. I think what might be better for me is to actually record the audio with the video at normal volume but focus on camera engagement and not so much on the audio track (which is guitar playing ) being perfect...

    then if I record the audio separately and put both audio tracks and the video track in Cakewalk I think it would be easier to sync up the better audio track with the video and then delete the original audio track...?

    or perhaps I should be using other software and I'm trying to do something with Cakewalk when it isn't the best tool for the job (especially for someone fairly new to daws)

  4. thanks.   "use audiosnap to sync it to the original audio track."  But there wouldn't be any usable original audio track, correct?  Since I muted it.   The other question is whether cakewalk will import a video track, allow combination with a supplemental audio track, and then output a file that contains both the audio and video.
    I can always use Handbrake to convert to mp4 if Cakewalk won't do that.

  5. I want to record a video ( mp4) with the audio source muted, then record the audio track ( mp3)  and combine the two.  I've heard of audiosnap but haven't used it.  Will Cakewalk load two such files and allow me to sync them rhythmically? ( without losing the video )

  6. I'll go back through all replies now.   But I think this guitar instrument I downloaded may not be ready for prime time.    Cakewalk is scanning for VSTs and is looking in the correct folder but all that's there is a DLL and a readme file, no "sem" files.   Clicking through seems to load the vst but Cakewalk may be locking up at that point.

    image.png.3b92ce195fa46935fa653aba6320c19f.png

     

     

    https://www.dskmusic.com/dsk-electrik-guitarz/

  7. Yes, it's going to take me an hour just to go through this morning's posts and digest them.  I really appreciate the help.   I retired as a Sql Server Database Admin last year so you'd think technical work would come naturally.  Well, it does, but the DAW world sure seems to have it's own little place in heaven.  :-)

    Hopefully this link shows my Cakewalk screen better.   I believe the version provided by BandLab is the platinum version

    My Cakewalk Screen

     

    Release Notes (2019.01)

    Hotfix 1-23-2019

    Address an issue in which Mix Recall was not applying presets

    This hotfix increments CbB to version 25.01.0.27

     

  8. Thanks again.

    I also looked at a vocal removal filter as a means to get backing tracks for a "jam band" that has trouble getting certain instruments ( drummer ) to show up consistently.    The best I could do with that was reduced vocal ( not eliminated ) without having too much negative effect on the other instruments.  This was working with an mp3, not a midi file, so just one combined track.   For our purposes, reduced vocal might actually be a good idea so the vocal keeps us on track with the song.  Ours is just a jam group with no real plans to play out for an audience ( at this time )

  9. Thanks all.  First  question: would you suggest sticking with the "basic" Lens rather than advanced etc at this point?   

    I also looked at a vocal removal filter as a means to get backing tracks for a "jam band" that has trouble getting certain instruments ( drummer ) to show up consistently.    The best I could do with that was reduced vocal ( not eliminated ) without having too much negative effect on the other instruments.  This was working with an mp3, not a midi file, so just one combined track.   For our purposes, reduced vocal might actually be a good idea so the vocal keeps us on track with the song.  Ours is just a jam group with no real plans to play out for an audience ( at this time )

×
×
  • Create New...