Jump to content

T on Y

Members
  • Posts

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by T on Y

  1. I dont think this is a 'Me' issue as I've tried on multiple  PC's and browsers ..... but who knows ????

    The online documentation  has no images in it  ..... sort of

    https://legacy.cakewalk.com/Documentation?product=Cakewalk&language=3&help=Introduction.24.html

    There's a place holder where the image should be  and if you right click and select 'Load Image' option nothing happens but if you select the 'Open in New Tab' option the image is downloaded and displayed

    As Marvin Gaye sang .... 'What's Going On'

     

  2. Greetings...

    So with the arrival of 'Next' & 'Sonar'  what will happen with CbyB

    My understanding is that I will be able to continue to use CbyB as its already installed but say I get a new system will i be able to get access to the old CbyB installation files or is it at this point where a will have to look at paying for this software  ??

    Thanks for any help . . .

  3. If ive understood the countless DAW videos I've watched on YT then More cores is better if your composing Orchestral or Hybrid orchestral music and Single core speed is much more important for  other types of music 

    Am I right in assuming the I5 is the better option (I generally write songs in the 'Any other type of music' category 

    i5-13500 Processor, 14 P Cores , 6 E Cores,  Pcore Base Frequency  2.5 GHz

    i7-12700 Processor, 6 P Cores,  8 Ecores, PCore Base Frequency  2.1 Ghz

  4. So what is the better for music production 

     

    i5-13500 Processor, 14 P Cores , 6 E Cores,  Pcore Base Frequency  2.5 GHz

    i7-12700 Processor, 6 P Cores,  8 Ecores, PCore Base Frequency  2.1 Ghz

     

    Its a moot point if purchasing from Chillblast as their music production PC only offers the i5

     

     

  5. Thanks for all your  thoughts chaps

    Historically the stuff ive written in the past would fall into the '24-track song-writing demos' category (20 ish VST instrument )  but in the last year Ive written a few 'Orchestral ' tracks (30  kontakt)  instruments all on a 6th Gen  I-7

    I just want to have a better machine than I currently have.

    So if my old system can deal with what Ive already done then a new one should be a great improvement

    The question then becomes do I do What Jack did and buy the biggest CPU I can but rarely use it to full capacity ? ..... or

    or go the I-7 route which will be less costly !!

  6. I have a fair number of questions but don't know where to start...?

    I'll put some context  here though . 

    I am about to retire and fancy a newer Windows based PC  to make music with.

    I will only be recording myself so my needs are modest compared to some.  And whilst it would be nice to have 13th gen i9  64 mb ram etc  my first question is what's going to suit my needs

    But a little more specificity to my questions

    What cpu should I start with 

     

  7. Cakewalk isnt as good at detecting  audio file tempos than Cubase is.... (Don't hate me !)

    I have used Cubase to extract tempos from an audio file (City To City by Gerry Rafferty) but cant get it into CbyB

    My first choice was to export midi but although midi note data is imported from Cubase the tempo information isn't showing

    Cubase can export a tempo map but I think its only readable by Cubase (.SRT) 

    Is there a way to achieve this . . . ?

×
×
  • Create New...